These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15355148)
1. The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard. Burns BD; Wieth M J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):434-49. PubMed ID: 15355148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review. Saenen L; Heyvaert M; Van Dooren W; Schaeken W; Onghena P Psychol Belg; 2018 Jun; 58(1):128-158. PubMed ID: 30479812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain activities associated with learning of the Monty Hall Dilemma task. Hirao T; Murphy TI; Masaki H Psychophysiology; 2017 Sep; 54(9):1359-1369. PubMed ID: 28480973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The causal psycho-logic of choice. Sloman SA; Hagmayer Y Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):407-12. PubMed ID: 16899398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning inhibition in the Monty Hall problem: the role of dysfunctional counterfactual prescriptions. Petrocelli JV; Harris AK Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1297-311. PubMed ID: 21606216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma. Herbranson WT; Schroeder J J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 20175592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning. Tubau E; Aguilar-Lleyda D; Johnson ED Front Psychol; 2015; 6():353. PubMed ID: 25873906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The probability of causal conditionals. Over DE; Hadjichristidis C; Evans JS; Handley SJ; Sloman SA Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):62-97. PubMed ID: 16839539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions. Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overcoming illusory inferences in a probabilistic counterintuitive problem: the role of explicit representations. Tubau E; Alonso D Mem Cognit; 2003 Jun; 31(4):596-607. PubMed ID: 12872875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment. Perales JC; Shanks DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working memory capacity and a notorious brain teaser: the case of the Monty Hall Dilemma. De Neys W; Verschueren N Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 16909937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new version of the Monty Hall Dilemma with unequal probabilities. Granberg D Behav Processes; 1999 Nov; 48(1-2):25-34. PubMed ID: 24897560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Further investigation of the Monty Hall Dilemma in pigeons and rats. Stagner JP; Zentall TR Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():14-21. PubMed ID: 25452075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. It all make sense: biomedical knowledge, causal connections and memory in the novice diagnostician. Woods NN; Brooks LR; Norman GR Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 Nov; 12(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 17318360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]