These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15355391)
1. Titanium release from implants prepared with different surface roughness. Wennerberg A; Ide-Ektessabi A; Hatkamata S; Sawase T; Johansson C; Albrektsson T; Martinelli A; Södervall U; Odelius H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15355391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment. Fawzy AS; Amer MA Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) and XPS (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) study of titanium implant surfaces coated with anodic titanium-oxide layer]. Suba C; Velich N; Vida G; Kovács L; Kiss G; Szabó G Fogorv Sz; 2003 Oct; 96(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 14635492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in-vivo study in rabbits. Fröjd V; Franke-Stenport V; Meirelles L; Wennerberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 37(6):561-6. PubMed ID: 18346880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants. Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-conducting properties of titanium dioxide surfaces on titanium implants. Petersson IU; Löberg JE; Fredriksson AS; Ahlberg EK Biomaterials; 2009 Sep; 30(27):4471-9. PubMed ID: 19524291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histometric evaluation of bone around titanium implants with different surface treatments in rats exposed to cigarette smoke inhalation. Correa MG; Gomes Campos ML; César-Neto JB; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 19302391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometric analysis of the interface between bone and titanium implants. Eriksson C; Malmberg P; Nygren H Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2008 Apr; 22(7):943-9. PubMed ID: 18306212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]