144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15355391)
1. Titanium release from implants prepared with different surface roughness.
Wennerberg A; Ide-Ektessabi A; Hatkamata S; Sawase T; Johansson C; Albrektsson T; Martinelli A; Södervall U; Odelius H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15355391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.
Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) and XPS (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) study of titanium implant surfaces coated with anodic titanium-oxide layer].
Suba C; Velich N; Vida G; Kovács L; Kiss G; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Oct; 96(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 14635492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in-vivo study in rabbits.
Fröjd V; Franke-Stenport V; Meirelles L; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 37(6):561-6. PubMed ID: 18346880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-conducting properties of titanium dioxide surfaces on titanium implants.
Petersson IU; Löberg JE; Fredriksson AS; Ahlberg EK
Biomaterials; 2009 Sep; 30(27):4471-9. PubMed ID: 19524291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histometric evaluation of bone around titanium implants with different surface treatments in rats exposed to cigarette smoke inhalation.
Correa MG; Gomes Campos ML; César-Neto JB; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 19302391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometric analysis of the interface between bone and titanium implants.
Eriksson C; Malmberg P; Nygren H
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2008 Apr; 22(7):943-9. PubMed ID: 18306212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
