263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15355559)
1. An improved segmentation method for in vivo microCT imaging.
Waarsing JH; Day JS; Weinans H
J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Oct; 19(10):1640-50. PubMed ID: 15355559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of CT image segmentation methods on the accuracy of long bone 3D reconstructions.
Rathnayaka K; Sahama T; Schuetz MA; Schmutz B
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21030288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro-CT bone analysis.
Buie HR; Campbell GM; Klinck RJ; MacNeil JA; Boyd SK
Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):505-15. PubMed ID: 17693147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of vertebral and femoral trabecular morphology and stiffness using a flat-panel C-arm-based CT approach.
Mulder L; van Rietbergen B; Noordhoek NJ; Ito K
Bone; 2012 Jan; 50(1):200-8. PubMed ID: 22057082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new high-resolution computed tomography (CT) segmentation method for trabecular bone architectural analysis.
Scherf H; Tilgner R
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Sep; 140(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 19280676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of bone micro-architecture measurements in rodents by in vivo micro-computed tomography is maximized with three-dimensional image registration.
Nishiyama KK; Campbell GM; Klinck RJ; Boyd SK
Bone; 2010 Jan; 46(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 19796719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmentation techniques for analysis of bone by three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging.
Dufresne T
Technol Health Care; 1998 Dec; 6(5-6):351-9. PubMed ID: 10100938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of micro-CT, microradiography and histomorphometry in bone research.
Gielkens PF; Schortinghuis J; de Jong JR; Huysmans MC; Leeuwen MB; Raghoebar GM; Bos RR; Stegenga B
Arch Oral Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(6):558-66. PubMed ID: 18190892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A local adaptive threshold strategy for high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone.
Burghardt AJ; Kazakia GJ; Majumdar S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1678-86. PubMed ID: 17602299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thresholding technique for accurate analysis of density and geometry in QCT, pQCT and microCT images.
Hangartner TN
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2007; 7(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17396001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of trabecular bone structure with multidetector spiral computed tomography in a simulated soft-tissue environment.
Bauer JS; Link TM; Burghardt A; Henning TD; Mueller D; Majumdar S; Prevrhal S
Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Jun; 80(6):366-73. PubMed ID: 17520165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and microCT.
Chappard D; Retailleau-Gaborit N; Legrand E; Baslé MF; Audran M
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1177-84. PubMed ID: 15940370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro computed tomography with 2D histological sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies.
Thomsen JS; Laib A; Koller B; Prohaska S; Mosekilde L; Gowin W
J Microsc; 2005 May; 218(Pt 2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15857378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry for assessment of new bone formation in a calvarial experimental model.
Yeom H; Blanchard S; Kim S; Zunt S; Chu TM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 18362725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new accurate and precise 3-D segmentation method for skeletal structures in volumetric CT data.
Kang Y; Engelke K; Kalender WA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 May; 22(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 12846428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional characterization of cortical bone microstructure by microcomputed tomography: validation with ultrasonic and microscopic measurements.
Basillais A; Bensamoun S; Chappard C; Brunet-Imbault B; Lemineur G; Ilharreborde B; Ho Ba Tho MC; Benhamou CL
J Orthop Sci; 2007 Mar; 12(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 17393269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MicroCT examination of human bone specimens: effects of polymethylmethacrylate embedding on structural parameters.
Perilli E; Baruffaldi F; Visentin M; Bordini B; Traina F; Cappello A; Viceconti M
J Microsc; 2007 Feb; 225(Pt 2):192-200. PubMed ID: 17359254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of bone union/nonunion in an experimental model using microcomputed technology.
Schmidhammer R; Zandieh S; Mittermayr R; Pelinka LE; Leixnering M; Hopf R; Kroepfl A; Redl H
J Trauma; 2006 Jul; 61(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 16832271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deriving tissue density and elastic modulus from microCT bone scans.
Wagner DW; Lindsey DP; Beaupre GS
Bone; 2011 Nov; 49(5):931-8. PubMed ID: 21820094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Bone segmentation in human CT images].
Li Y; Hong B; Gao S; Liu K
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 21(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 15143532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
