These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15356500)
21. A comparison of three-dimensional stress distribution and displacement of naso-maxillary complex on application of forces using quad-helix and nickel titanium palatal expander 2 (NPE2): a FEM study. Kumar A; Ghafoor H; Khanam A Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 27245236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Morphologic changes in the transverse dimension using the Fränkel appliance. Owen AH Am J Orthod; 1983 Mar; 83(3):200-17. PubMed ID: 6338726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dentoskeletal effects of 3 maxillary expanders in patients with clefts: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Figueiredo DS; Bartolomeo FU; Romualdo CR; Palomo JM; Horta MC; Andrade I; Oliveira DD Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 24975001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A longitudinal study of skeletal side effects induced by rapid maxillary expansion. Chang JY; McNamara JA; Herberger TA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 9294364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of skeletal and dental changes between 2-point and 4-point rapid palatal expanders. Lamparski DG; Rinchuse DJ; Close JM; Sciote JJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 12637904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the treatment effects of different rapid maxillary expansion devices on the maxilla and the mandible. Part 1: Evaluation of dentoalveolar changes. Canan S; Şenışık NE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1125-1138. PubMed ID: 28554458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study. Hourfar J; Kinzinger GS; Ludwig B; Spindler J; Lisson JA J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):314-24. PubMed ID: 27272056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Short-term skeletal and dental changes following bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial study. Zandi M; Miresmaeili A; Heidari A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1190-5. PubMed ID: 24704281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bone plate and root length after maxillary expansion using tooth-borne and tooth-tissue-borne banded expanders. Lemos Rinaldi MR; Azeredo F; Martinelli de Lima E; Deon Rizzatto SM; Sameshima G; Macedo de Menezes L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):504-516. PubMed ID: 30268261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of a bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance during orthodontic treatment. Memikoglu TU; Işeri H Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 10371431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Skeletal and dental response to rapid maxillary expansion with 2- versus 4-band appliances. Davidovitch M; Efstathiou S; Sarne O; Vardimon AD Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 15821693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A long-term study on the expansion effects of the cervical-pull facebow with and without rapid maxillary expansion. Fenderson FA; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Veith CJ Angle Orthod; 2004 Aug; 74(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 15387020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of dentoalveolar inclination treated by two palatal expanders. Kiliç N; Kiki A; Oktay H Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18276928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of treatment outcomes with banded and bonded RPE appliances. Reed N; Ghosh J; Nanda RS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 10393578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in pediatric sleep-disordered breathing and changes in quality of life with rapid maxillary expansion. Katyal V; Pamula Y; Daynes CN; Martin J; Dreyer CW; Kennedy D; Sampson WJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):860-71. PubMed ID: 24286909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of the sagittal and vertical dentofacial effects of maxillary expansion produced by a memory screw and a hyrax screw. Halicioğlu K; Yavuz I Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 27468589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]