These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15357149)

  • 1. Users' perceptions of the impact of electronic aids to daily living throughout the acquisition process.
    Ripat J; Strock A
    Assist Technol; 2004; 16(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 15357149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living.
    Jutai J; Rigby P; Ryan S; Stickel S
    Assist Technol; 2000; 12(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 11508402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of electronic aids to daily living on the lives of persons with cervical spinal cord injuries.
    Rigby P; Ryan S; Joos S; Cooper B; Jutai JW; Steggles I
    Assist Technol; 2005; 17(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 16392713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic aids for daily living.
    Little R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(5):vii-ix. PubMed ID: 17943673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings.
    Huang IC; Sugden D; Beveridge S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Mar; 4(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 19253098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the meaning of a new assistive technology device for older individuals.
    Gramstad A; Storli SL; Hamran T
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Nov; 9(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 24839989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assistive technology improves lives of people with disabilities.
    Vickery K
    Provider; 2005 May; 31(5):16-7, 19-20, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 16111073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of the impact of assistive devices on daily life of three individuals with quadriplegia.
    Bell P; Hinojosa J
    Assist Technol; 1995; 7(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 10159862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The physical and psychological impact of using a computer-based environmental control system: a case study.
    Squires LA; Rush F; Hopkinson A; Val M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Sep; 8(5):434-43. PubMed ID: 23336601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploration of health perceptions and assistive technology use by driving status as related to transportation independence in New Delhi, India.
    Beyene NM; Steinfeld A; Pearlman J; Cooper RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Jul; 7(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 22324852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition software as an assistive device: a pilot study of user satisfaction and psychosocial impact.
    Derosier R; Farber RS
    Work; 2005; 25(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 16131742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes.
    Lenker JA; Harris F; Taugher M; Smith RO
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Sep; 8(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 23350880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On an equal footing: adults' accounts of the experience of using assistive devices for standing.
    Nordström B; Näslund A; Ekenberg L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Jan; 8(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 22519553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Getting used to assistive devices: ambivalent experiences by frail elderly persons.
    Skymne C; Dahlin-Ivanoff S; Claesson L; Eklund K
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2012 Mar; 19(2):194-203. PubMed ID: 21534712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The psychosocial impact on standing devices.
    Nordström B; Nyberg L; Ekenberg L; Näslund A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 23782225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction.
    Shone Stickel M; Ryan S; Rigby PJ; Jutai JW
    Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Jan 10-Feb 15; 24(1-3):115-25. PubMed ID: 11827145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent trends in the development and evaluation of assistive robotic manipulation devices.
    Allin S; Eckel E; Markham H; Brewer BR
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2010 Feb; 21(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 19951778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities.
    Kaye HS; Yeager P; Reed M
    Assist Technol; 2008; 20(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 19160906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assistive technology self-management intervention for older Hispanics: a feasibility study.
    Orellano-Colón EM; Harrison-Cruz S; López-Lugo E; Ramos-Peraza S; Meléndez-Ortiz A; Ortiz-Torres J; Rodríguez-Marrero J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):862-870. PubMed ID: 31172826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities.
    Carver J; Ganus A; Ivey JM; Plummer T; Eubank A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Aug; 11(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 25815679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.