123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15357199)
1. Choice of the regularization parameter for perfusion quantification with MRI.
Sourbron S; Luypaert R; Van Schuerbeek P; Dujardin M; Stadnik T
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):3307-24. PubMed ID: 15357199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data by linear inversion: choice of the regularization parameter.
Sourbron S; Luypaert R; Van Schuerbeek P; Dujardin M; Stadnik T; Osteaux M
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Jul; 52(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 15236389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced data based on singular value decomposition optimized by generalized cross validation.
Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Miyazaki S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2004; 3(4):165-75. PubMed ID: 16093635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pixel-by-pixel deconvolution of bolus-tracking data: optimization and implementation.
Sourbron S; Dujardin M; Makkat S; Luypaert R
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):429-47. PubMed ID: 17202625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robustness of spatio-temporal regularization in perfusion MRI deconvolution: An application to acute ischemic stroke.
Giacalone M; Frindel C; Robini M; Cervenansky F; Grenier E; Rousseau D
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Nov; 78(5):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 28019027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrepancy-based adaptive regularization for GRAPPA reconstruction.
Qu P; Wang C; Shen GX
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 16758468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cerebral blood flow measurement by dynamic contrast MRI using singular value decomposition with an adaptive threshold.
Liu HL; Pu Y; Liu Y; Nickerson L; Andrews T; Fox PT; Gao JH
Magn Reson Med; 1999 Jul; 42(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 10398963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian hemodynamic parameter estimation by bolus tracking perfusion weighted imaging.
Boutelier T; Kudo K; Pautot F; Sasaki M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jul; 31(7):1381-95. PubMed ID: 22410325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using a deconvolution approach based on regression and singular value decomposition.
Koh TS; Wu XY; Cheong LH; Lim CC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Dec; 23(12):1532-42. PubMed ID: 15575410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kimura T; Kusahara H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):107-20. PubMed ID: 19783874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of pulmonary microcirculation by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of four regularization methods.
Salehi Ravesh M; Brix G; Laun FB; Kuder TA; Puderbach M; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Ley S; Fieselmann A; Herrmann MF; Schranz W; Semmler W; Risse F
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jan; 69(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 22383403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of model-independent deconvolution techniques to estimate blood perfusion.
Kind T; Houtzager I; Faes TJ; Hofman MB
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2602-7. PubMed ID: 21096179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Mehndiratta A; MacIntosh BJ; Crane DE; Payne SJ; Chappell MA
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():560-70. PubMed ID: 22975158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A microfabricated phantom for quantitative MR perfusion measurements: validation of singular value decomposition deconvolution method.
Ebrahimi B; Swanson SD; Chupp TE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 20601306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deconvolution with simple extrapolation for improved cerebral blood flow measurement in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging during acute ischemic stroke.
MacDonald ME; Smith MR; Frayne R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jun; 29(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 21546188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perfusion quantification by model-free arterial spin labeling using nonlinear stochastic regularization deconvolution.
Ahlgren A; Wirestam R; Petersen ET; Ståhlberg F; Knutsson L
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Nov; 70(5):1470-80. PubMed ID: 23281031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.
Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Mar; 25(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 15674238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perfusion quantification using Gaussian process deconvolution.
Andersen IK; Szymkowiak A; Rasmussen CE; Hanson LG; Marstrand JR; Larsson HB; Hansen LK
Magn Reson Med; 2002 Aug; 48(2):351-61. PubMed ID: 12210944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: Improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization.
Calamante F; Gadian DG; Connelly A
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Dec; 50(6):1237-47. PubMed ID: 14648572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the design of filters for Fourier and oSVD-based deconvolution in bolus tracking perfusion MRI.
Gall P; Emerich P; Kjølby BF; Kellner E; Mader I; Kiselev VG
MAGMA; 2010 Jun; 23(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 20512521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
