BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15357201)

  • 1. Optimization of standard patient radiographic images for chest, skull and pelvis exams in conventional x-ray equipment.
    Pina DR; Duarte SB; Ghilardi Netto T; Trad CS; Brochi MA; de Oliveira SC
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):N215-26. PubMed ID: 15357201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phantom development for radiographic image optimization of chest, skull and pelvis examination for nonstandard patient.
    Pina DR; Duarte SB; Ghilardi Netto T; Morceli J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Jan; 67(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18783956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between subjective evaluation and physical parameters for radiographic images optimization.
    Alves AF; Alvarez M; Ribeiro SM; Duarte SB; Miranda JR; Pina DR
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 26573131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of phantom for radiographic image optimization of standard patient in the lateral view of chest and skull examination.
    Pina DR; Duarte SB; Morceli J; Ghilardi Netto T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1623-30. PubMed ID: 16854589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.
    Sandborg M; McVey G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 11695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Chest tomosynthesis].
    Shibata K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1486-91. PubMed ID: 22104244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
    Ploussi A; Alexopoulou E; Economopoulos N; Argentos SI; Tsitsia V; Arapakis I; Kordolaimi S; Seimenis I; Efstathopoulos EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 24107575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of the phase-contrast radiography edge-enhancement effect in a cabinet x-ray system.
    Donnelly EF; Lewis KG; Wolske KM; Pickens DR; Price RR
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16357428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique.
    Mooney R; Thomas PS
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):852-60. PubMed ID: 9828798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.