BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15357825)

  • 1. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
    Zhao Y; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
    Hewett P; Ganser GH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of variability and uncertainty using mixture distributions: evaluation of sample size, mixing weights, and separation between components.
    Zheng J; Frey HC
    Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 15209930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for air toxic emission inventories with censored emission factor data.
    Frey HC; Zhao Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(22):6094-100. PubMed ID: 15573612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry.
    Glass DC; Gray CN
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jun; 45(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11378148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
    Ganser GH; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-parametric methods for cost-effectiveness analysis: the central limit theorem and the bootstrap compared.
    Nixon RM; Wonderling D; Grieve RD
    Health Econ; 2010 Mar; 19(3):316-33. PubMed ID: 19378353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of statistical methods for estimation of less than detectable ionising radiation exposures.
    Daniels RD; Yiin JH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 16517566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure data from multi-application, multi-industry maintenance of surfaces and joints sealed with asbestos-containing gaskets and packing.
    Boelter F; Simmons C; Hewett P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):194-209. PubMed ID: 21391064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
    Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
    Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating distributions out of qualitative and (semi)quantitative microbiological contamination data for use in risk assessment.
    Busschaert P; Geeraerd AH; Uyttendaele M; Van Impe JF
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 138(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 20202713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Ukoumunne OC; Davison AC; Gulliford MC; Chinn S
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis.
    Wedenberg M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric bootstrap for testing model fitting in the proportional hazards framework: an application to the survival analysis of Bruna dels Pirineus beef calves.
    Casellas J; Tarrés J; Piedrafita J; Varona L
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2609-16. PubMed ID: 16971560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence limits for lognormal percentiles and for lognormal mean based on samples with multiple detection limits.
    Krishnamoorthy K; Xu Z
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jun; 55(5):495-509. PubMed ID: 21610082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
    Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accurate confidence limits for quantiles under random censoring.
    Strawderman RL; Parzen MI; Wells MT
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1399-415. PubMed ID: 9423256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
    Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of left-censored longitudinal data with application to viral load in HIV infection.
    Jacqmin-Gadda H; Thiébaut R; Chêne G; Commenges D
    Biostatistics; 2000 Dec; 1(4):355-68. PubMed ID: 12933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.