143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15358719)
1. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The cumulated singleton/twin delivery rates per oocyte pick-up: the CUSIDERA and CUTWIDERA.
Germond M; Urner F; Chanson A; Primi MP; Wirthner D; Senn A
Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2442-4. PubMed ID: 15358719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Number of transferred embryos: how to reduce multiple pregnancies.
Germond M; Primi MP; Urner F; Chanson A; Wirthner D; Senn A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Dec; 1034():93-100. PubMed ID: 15731302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten.
Tiitinen A; Hydén-Granskog C; Gissler M
Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2439-41. PubMed ID: 15319392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
Nyboe Andersen A; Gianaroli L; Nygren KG; ;
Hum Reprod; 2004 Mar; 19(3):490-503. PubMed ID: 14998942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation.
Borini A; Cattoli M; Bulletti C; Coticchio G
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1127():49-58. PubMed ID: 18443329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
Andersen AN; Gianaroli L; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG;
Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1158-76. PubMed ID: 15665021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of embryo, zygote and oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technology.
Fawole AO; Oladapo OT
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2007 Dec; 36(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 18564648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
; Andersen AN; Gianaroli L; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1680-97. PubMed ID: 16585126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
Ferraretti AP; Goossens V; de Mouzon J; Bhattacharya S; Castilla JA; Korsak V; Kupka M; Nygren KG; Nyboe Andersen A; ;
Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2571-84. PubMed ID: 22786779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
Andersen AN; Goossens V; Ferraretti AP; Bhattacharya S; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; ;
Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 18281243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The singleton, term gestation, and live birth rate per cycle initiated: a 1-year experience in in vitro fertilization cycles with native and donated oocytes.
Bellver J; Albert C; Soares SR; Alvarez C; Pellicer A
Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1404-9. PubMed ID: 15866576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cumulative delivery rate in an in vitro fertilization program with a single embryo transfer policy.
Sundström P; Saldeen P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 19455443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
