These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15358846)
1. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Gur D; Stalder JS; Hardesty LA; Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Shindel BE; Rockette HE Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 15358846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment. Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer. Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Seong MH; Cho N; Chang JM Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19863409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of computer-aided detection systems in the detection of small invasive breast carcinoma. Ellis RL; Meade AA; Mathiason MA; Willison KM; Logan-Young W Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 17885183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images. Zheng B; Shah R; Wallace L; Hakim C; Ganott MA; Gur D Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1245-50. PubMed ID: 12449356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues. Baker JA; Lo JY; Delong DM; Floyd CE Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 15358850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided detection schemes: the effect of limiting the number of cued regions in each case. Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams G; Shindel B; Catullo V; Good WF; Gur D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 14975949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study. Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment. Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Lederman D; Wang X; Gur D Br J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 85(1014):e153-61. PubMed ID: 21343322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]