These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1535891)

  • 21. Blinded-reader comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for carotid artery bifurcation stenosis.
    Mittl RL; Broderick M; Carpenter JP; Goldberg HI; Listerud J; Mishkin MM; Berkowitz HD; Atlas SW
    Stroke; 1994 Jan; 25(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 8266380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
    Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US.
    Huston J; Lewis BD; Wiebers DO; Meyer FB; Riederer SJ; Weaver AL
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 8421731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Chiras J; Dormont D; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Perioperative evaluation of internal carotid artery stenoses: value of multislab MR angiography].
    Vogl TJ; Kutter RW; Schön K; Juergens M; Hepp W; Balzer JO; Steger W; Felix R
    Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1023-32. PubMed ID: 9092222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography.
    Cumming MJ; Morrow IM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):517-23. PubMed ID: 8079836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of MR angiography with contrast angiography for the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.
    Dadachanji MC; Shroff MM; Modi D; Jankharia BG
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1995 Feb; 43(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 9282669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.
    Marks MP; Napel S; Jordan JE; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prevalence of complicated carotid atheroma as detected by magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia.
    Murphy RE; Moody AR; Morgan PS; Martel AL; Delay GS; Allder S; MacSweeney ST; Tennant WG; Gladman J; Lowe J; Hunt BJ
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(24):3053-8. PubMed ID: 12796136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High spatial-resolution CE-MRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla.
    Nael K; Ruehm SG; Michaely HJ; Pope W; Laub G; Finn JP; Villablanca JP
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Apr; 41(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 16523022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries.
    Levy RA; Prince MR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 8659374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Contrast enhanced MR-angiography (CE-MRA): do contrast media with higher T1 relaxation improve imaging of carotid stenoses?].
    Friese S; Krapf H; Fetter M; Vonthein R; Skalej M; Küker W
    Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):542-6. PubMed ID: 11471296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical potentialities and limitations of two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis].
    Nöldeke HA; Friedrich JM; Wallner B; Weidenmaier W
    Rofo; 1992 Dec; 157(6):566-72. PubMed ID: 1457793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: MR angiography with magnetization transfer and variable flip angle.
    Fürst G; Hofer M; Steinmetz H; Kambergs J; Paselk C; Liebsch D; Aulich A; Mödder U
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Oct; 17(9):1749-57. PubMed ID: 8896632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Carotid arteries: evaluation with low-field-strength MR angiography.
    Pavone P; Marsili L; Catalano C; Petroni GA; Aytan E; Cardone GP; Passariello R
    Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 1620836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Carotid bifurcation imaging: magnetic resonance angiography compared to conventional angiography and Doppler ultrasound.
    Buijs PC; Klop RB; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP; Bakker CJ; Beek FJ; van Gils AP; Dillon EH; Ramos LM
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1993 May; 7(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 8513902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Moyamoya disease: diagnosis with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Yamada I; Matsushima Y; Suzuki S
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):773-8. PubMed ID: 1509066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid artery combining two- and three-dimensional acquisitions.
    Pan XM; Anderson CM; Reilly LM; Saloner D; Lee RE; Perez S; Krupski WC; Rapp JH
    J Vasc Surg; 1992 Oct; 16(4):609-15; discussion 615-8. PubMed ID: 1404681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can noninvasive studies replace conventional angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid stenosis?
    De Marco JK; Schonfeld S; Wesbey G
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 1996 Nov; 6(4):911-29. PubMed ID: 8824140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical significance of the flow gap in carotid magnetic resonance angiography.
    Heiserman JE; Zabramski JM; Drayer BP; Keller PJ
    J Neurosurg; 1996 Sep; 85(3):384-7. PubMed ID: 8751620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.