BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15358997)

  • 1. The cost-effectiveness of screening programs using single and multiple birth cohort simulations: a comparison using a model of cervical cancer.
    Dewilde S; Anderson R
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):486-92. PubMed ID: 15358997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
    Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Hungary.
    Vokó Z; Nagyjánosi L; Margitai B; Kövi R; Tóth Z; László D; Kaló Z
    Value Health; 2012 Jan; 15(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22264970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in Australia: what is the impact of screening at different intervals or over a different age range?
    Anderson R; Haas M; Shanahan M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 32(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 18290913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests.
    Kulasingam SL; Myers ER; Lawson HW; McConnell KJ; Kerlikowske K; Melnikow J; Washington AE; Sawaya GF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):321-8. PubMed ID: 16449119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening.
    Bidus MA; Maxwell GL; Kulasingam S; Rose GS; Elkas JC; Chernofsky M; Myers ER
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 107(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 16648402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The health and economic impact of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.
    Wong G; Howard K; Webster A; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Transplantation; 2009 Apr; 87(7):1078-91. PubMed ID: 19352131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
    Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
    Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine hepatitis C virus screening in pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Plunkett BA; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1153-61. PubMed ID: 15846195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Costs and effects of alternative screening programs against cervical cancer].
    Gyrd-Hansen D; Hølund B; Andersen P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Aug; 158(35):4912-5. PubMed ID: 8801698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incremental benefit and cost-effectiveness of high-dose statin therapy in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.
    Chan PS; Nallamothu BK; Gurm HS; Hayward RA; Vijan S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2398-409. PubMed ID: 17452609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cost effectiveness of human papilloma virus testing in cervical cancer screening: a literature review].
    Mejía A; Salas W
    Biomedica; 2008 Mar; 28(1):160-72. PubMed ID: 18645671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
    Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
    Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against cervical cancer: a multi-regional analysis assessing the impact of vaccine characteristics and alternative vaccination scenarios.
    Suárez E; Smith JS; Bosch FX; Nieminen P; Chen CJ; Torvinen S; Demarteau N; Standaert B
    Vaccine; 2008 Sep; 26 Suppl 5():F29-45. PubMed ID: 18992380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to screen for cervical cancer after HPV16/18 vaccination in The Netherlands.
    Coupé VM; de Melker HE; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
    Vaccine; 2009 Aug; 27(37):5111-9. PubMed ID: 19567242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ["Cost-effectiveness" of cervical screening].
    Kostova P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 17974169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.
    Delea TE; Karnon J; Smith RE; Johnston SR; Brandman J; Sung JC; Gross PE
    Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):374-86. PubMed ID: 16834524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer.
    Dan YY; So JB; Yeoh KG
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jun; 4(6):709-16. PubMed ID: 16765306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Belgium: do not forget about cervical cancer screening.
    Thiry N; De Laet C; Hulstaert F; Neyt M; Huybrechts M; Cleemput I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 19366497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.