These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15359000)

  • 1. Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities.
    van Osch SM; Wakker PP; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):511-7. PubMed ID: 15359000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
    Bleichrodt H
    Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The construction of standard gamble utilities.
    van Osch SM; Stiggelbout AM
    Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 17(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 17410521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB
    J Health Econ; 2009 Jan; 28(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 19062114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health values of adolescents with cystic fibrosis.
    Yi MS; Britto MT; Wilmott RW; Kotagal UR; Eckman MH; Nielson DW; Kociela VL; Tsevat J
    J Pediatr; 2003 Feb; 142(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 12584533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between time trade-off and the EuroQol.
    Ariza-Ariza R; Hernández-Cruz B; Carmona L; Dolores Ruiz-Montesinos M; Ballina J; Navarro-Sarabia F;
    Arthritis Rheum; 2006 Oct; 55(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 17013822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of health and vision utilities in low vision patients.
    Malkin AG; Goldstein JE; Massof RW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 22227913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biases from omitted risk effects in standard gamble utilities.
    Pope R
    J Health Econ; 2004 Jul; 23(4):695-735. PubMed ID: 15587695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health utility bias: a systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation.
    Doctor JN; Bleichrodt H; Lin HJ
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 18556637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship of medical, demographic and psychosocial factors to direct and indirect health utility instruments in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Witney AG; Treharne GJ; Tavakoli M; Lyons AC; Vincent K; Scott DL; Kitas GD
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 Aug; 45(8):975-81. PubMed ID: 16461437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can we fix it? Yes we can! But what? A new test of procedural invariance in TTO-measurement.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB
    Health Econ; 2008 Jul; 17(7):877-85. PubMed ID: 18074409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health values of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.
    Sherman KE; Sherman SN; Chenier T; Tsevat J
    Arch Intern Med; 2004 Nov; 164(21):2377-82. PubMed ID: 15557419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The implications of linking questions within the SG and TTO methods.
    Spencer A
    Health Econ; 2004 Aug; 13(8):807-18. PubMed ID: 15322992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards a better QALY model.
    Abellán-Perpiñán JM; Pinto-Prades JL; Méndez-Martínez I; Badía-Llach X
    Health Econ; 2006 Jul; 15(7):665-76. PubMed ID: 16518836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The utility assessment method order influences measurement of parents' risk attitude.
    Finnell SM; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    Value Health; 2012; 15(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 22999143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of different strategies to collect standard gamble utilities.
    Hammerschmidt T; Zeitler HP; Gulich M; Leidl R
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):493-503. PubMed ID: 15358998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.
    Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Wong E; Griffith L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 60(10):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17884597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do visual analogue scale (VAS) derived standard gamble (SG) utilities agree with Health Utilities Index utilities? A comparison of patient and community preferences for health status in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
    Rashidi AA; Anis AH; Marra CA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Apr; 4():25. PubMed ID: 16626489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.
    Oliver A
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2219-29. PubMed ID: 15047079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.