These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1535914)

  • 1. Effects of a defective filter on magnification image quality in mammography.
    Cardenosa G; Eklund GW
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):894-5. PubMed ID: 1535914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molybdenum/aluminum filters perform effectively.
    Burns CB; Renner JB
    Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 8464998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of anode and filter material on image quality and glandular dose for screen-film mammography.
    Desponds L; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Hessler C; Samiri A; Valley JF
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Sep; 36(9):1165-82. PubMed ID: 1946601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique.
    Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjarngard BE
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The factor of magnification in mammography].
    Maggi S; Giuseppetti GM; Spiga G; Macchini M; Procaccini G; Gregori S; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):101-6. PubMed ID: 2781053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
    Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
    Küchler M; Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AAPM tutorial. Physics of mammography: image recording process.
    Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1990 Mar; 10(2):341-63. PubMed ID: 2183301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [DIMA-magnification mammography. Phantom studies on image quality and radiation exposure of the patient].
    Hermann KP; Funke M; Brüggemeyer H; Sperner W; Gruhl T; Koch R
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 9376560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters].
    Minski M; Säbel M; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S
    Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.