These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15359325)

  • 1. The quality of dental casts used in crown and bridgework.
    Alhouri N; McCord JF; Smith PW
    Br Dent J; 2004 Sep; 197(5):261-4; discussion 249. PubMed ID: 15359325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the quality of clinical procedures and technical standards of dental laboratories in fixed partial denture therapy.
    Albashaireh ZS; Alnegrish AS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10635191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges received at commercial dental laboratories.
    Winstanley RB; Carrotte PV; Johnson A
    Br Dent J; 1997 Sep; 183(6):209-13. PubMed ID: 9345799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing the quality of the impressions of prepared teeth.
    Storey D; Coward TJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 21(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23888527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of impressions for crowns and bridges: an assessment of the work received at three commercial dental laboratories. assessing qualities of impressions that may lead to occlusal discrepancies with indirect restorations.
    Storey D; Coward TJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Mar; 22(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24922994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales.
    Jenkins SJ; Lynch CD; Sloan AJ; Gilmour AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 19054289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre-doctoral students and prosthodontists.
    Bronson MR; Lindquist TJ; Dawson DV
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 16359478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced crown and bridge design.
    Cramer von Clausbruch S; Faust A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jul; 6(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 14601190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work--an investigation and review.
    Carrotte PV; Johnson A; Winstanley RB
    Br Dent J; 1998 Dec 12-26; 185(11-12):580-5. PubMed ID: 9885431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedure for occlusal refinement of mounted definitive casts to reduce clinical time required for adjustment of occlusion.
    Loos LG; Boyarsky HP; Quiring DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 11264931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009.
    Kilfeather GP; Lynch CD; Sloan AJ; Youngson CC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 20085617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey on the utilization of disposable quadrant articulators.
    Thornton LJ
    Gen Dent; 2002; 50(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 12029803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Considerations for services from dental technicians in fabrication of fixed prostheses: A survey of commercial dental laboratories in Thessaloniki, Greece.
    Hatzikyriakos A; Petridis HP; Tsiggos N; Sakelariou S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 17098500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of convergence angles of tooth preparations for complete crowns among dental students.
    Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; Rosenstiel SF
    J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):633-8. PubMed ID: 16139694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
    Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.