These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15359679)

  • 1. Foot shape modeling.
    Luximon A; Goonetilleke RS
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 15359679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling foot height and foot shape-related dimensions.
    Xiong S; Goonetilleke RS; Witana CP; Lee Au EY
    Ergonomics; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1272-89. PubMed ID: 18608473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D foot shape generation from 2D information.
    Luximon A; Goonetilleke RS; Zhang M
    Ergonomics; 2005 May; 48(6):625-41. PubMed ID: 16087498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Foot flare and foot axis.
    Goonetilleke RS; Luximon A
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):596-607. PubMed ID: 10774130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foot landmarking for footwear customization.
    Luximon A; Goonetilleke RS; Tsui KL
    Ergonomics; 2003 Mar; 46(4):364-83. PubMed ID: 12637176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions.
    Ozden H; Balci Y; Demirüstü C; Turgut A; Ertugrul M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):181-4. PubMed ID: 15567624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in foot shape: a study of Chinese young adults.
    Hong Y; Wang L; Xu DQ; Li JX
    Sports Biomech; 2011 Jun; 10(2):85-97. PubMed ID: 21834393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex-related differences in foot shape.
    Krauss I; Grau S; Mauch M; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1693-709. PubMed ID: 18941975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in male foot shape and size with weightbearing.
    Houston VL; Luo G; Mason CP; Mussman M; Garbarini M; Beattie AC
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2006; 96(4):330-43. PubMed ID: 16868327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. COMPARING 3D FOOT SHAPE MODELS BETWEEN TAIWANESE AND JAPANESE FEMALES.
    Lee YC; Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Wang MJ
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2015 Jun; 44(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27281917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data.
    Lee YC; Wang MJ
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 25361465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foot deformation during walking: differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet.
    Barisch-Fritz B; Schmeltzpfenning T; Plank C; Grau S
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(6):921-33. PubMed ID: 24684680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of gender on foot anthropometrics in older people.
    Paiva de Castro A; Rebelatto JR; Aurichio TR
    J Sport Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 20(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 21828380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex estimation using anthropometry of feet and footprints in a Western Australian population.
    Hemy N; Flavel A; Ishak NI; Franklin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):402.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23806341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of body mass on foot dimensions during pregnancy.
    Chiou WK; Chiu HT; Chao AS; Wang MH; Chen YL
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():212-7. PubMed ID: 25168196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity.
    Williams DS; McClay IS
    Phys Ther; 2000 Sep; 80(9):864-71. PubMed ID: 10960934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of foot anthropometry and plantar arch indices between German and Brazilian children.
    Sacco IC; Onodera AN; Bosch K; Rosenbaum D
    BMC Pediatr; 2015 Feb; 15():4. PubMed ID: 25886258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of anthropometric foot characteristics in children.
    Morrison SC; Durward BR; Watt GF; Donaldson MD
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2009; 99(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 19917735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings.
    Voracek M; Fisher ML; Rupp B; Lucas D; Fessler DM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17879647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphometric analysis of the foot in adult Turkish men.
    Hasde M; Ozan H; Akşit D; Onderoğlu S; Simşek C
    Kaibogaku Zasshi; 1994 Dec; 69(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 7887127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.