These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15359683)

  • 1. Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid drivers.
    Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 15359683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance.
    Ben-Yaacov A; Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 12452277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices.
    Dingus TA; McGehee DV; Manakkal N; Jahns SK; Carney C; Hankey JM
    Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):216-29. PubMed ID: 9302889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving.
    Bliss JP; Acton SA
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):499-509. PubMed ID: 14559409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
    Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: auditory icons.
    Belz SM; Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):608-18. PubMed ID: 10774131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness evaluation of simulative workshops for newly licensed drivers.
    Rosenbloom T; Eldror E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Feb; 63():30-6. PubMed ID: 24252555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.
    Thompson JP; Mackenzie JRR; Dutschke JK; Baldock MRJ; Raftery SJ; Wall J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():34-40. PubMed ID: 29544135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory displays as occasion setters.
    Mckeown D; Isherwood S; Conway G
    Hum Factors; 2010 Feb; 52(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 20653225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.
    Chen Y; Fu R; Xu Q; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 18074709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of single versus multiple warnings on driver performance.
    Cummings ML; Kilgore RM; Wang E; Tijerina L; Kochhar DS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 18074708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.