These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15359749)

  • 1. Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.
    Siegel EL; Reiner BI; Cadogan M
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Aug; 13(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 15359749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality-control issues on high-resolution diagnostic monitors.
    Parr LF; Anderson AL; Glennon BK; Fetherston P
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11442103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A filmless radiology teaching conference system for pertinent displaying and image searching.
    Abe K; Narata M; Tanaka I; Takahashi M; Igarashi A; Sasaki T; Matsuyama K; Tohi N; Kosuda S
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Dec; 22(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 18196340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques.
    Bennett WF; Vaswani KK; Mendiola JA; Spigos DG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():171-4. PubMed ID: 12105721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuing quality improvement procedures for a clinical PACS.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Avrin DE; Bazzill TM; Yin L; Arenson RL
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):111-4. PubMed ID: 9735446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
    Wang J; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():216-8. PubMed ID: 12105732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.
    Thompson DP; Koller CJ; Eatough JP
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):256-60. PubMed ID: 17038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of interstitial lung abnormalities on picture archive and communication system video monitors.
    Washowich TL; Williams SC; Richardson LA; Simmons GE; Dao NV; Allen TW; Hammet GC; Morris MJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Feb; 10(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9147526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Imaging monitors--requirements and pitfalls].
    Simmler R
    Radiologe; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1020-2. PubMed ID: 24068292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.
    Arenson RL; Andriole KP; Avrin DE; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 11110253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmark testing the Digital Imaging Network-Picture Archiving and Communications System proposal of the Department of Defense.
    Shelton PD; Lyche DK; Norton GS; Romlein J; Lawrence DP; Cawthon MA; Thomas JA; Richardson N
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10342252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of PACS display systems.
    Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting.
    Wade C; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):465-71. PubMed ID: 15151966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maintaining continuity of clinical operations while implementing large-scale filmless operations.
    Honea R; Mensch B
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):50-3. PubMed ID: 10342165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.
    Wang J; Langer S
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Nov; 10(4):158-68. PubMed ID: 9399169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The filmless radiology reading room: a survey of established picture archiving and communication system sites.
    Siegel E; Reiner B; Abiri M; Chacko A; Morin R; Ro DW; Spicer K; Strickland N; Young J
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):22-3. PubMed ID: 10847356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays.
    Groth DS; Bernatz SN; Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(3):719-32. PubMed ID: 11353118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper F; Protopapas Z
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):149-50. PubMed ID: 9735455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.