These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15359749)

  • 21. Suspension criteria for image monitors and viewing boxes.
    Tingberg A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 23188811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of performance of computer display monitors for radiological diagnosis; "diagnostic" high brightness monochrome LCD, 3MP vs "clinical review" colour LCD, 2MP.
    Sim L; Manthey K; Stuckey S
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2007 Jun; 30(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 17682398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Grayscale calibration and quality assurance of diagnostic monitors in a PACS system.
    Crespi A; Bonsignore F; Paruccini N; Macchi I
    Radiol Med; 2006 Sep; 111(6):863-75. PubMed ID: 16896553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS.
    Sim L; Manthey K; Esdaile P; Benson M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Sep; 27(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 15580844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.
    McIlgorm DJ; McNulty JP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140148. PubMed ID: 25421807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study.
    Wang J; Compton K; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2003 Jun; 16(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 12964056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. PACS workstation respecification: display, data flow, system integration, and environmental issues, derived from analysis of the Conquest Hospital pre-DICOM PACS experience.
    Foord KD
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(6):1161-9. PubMed ID: 10415256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis.
    Peer S; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Feb; 13(2):413-7. PubMed ID: 12599009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of low-cost computer monitors for the detection of cervical spine injuries in the emergency room: an observer confidence-based study.
    Brem MH; Böhner C; Brenning A; Gelse K; Radkow T; Blanke M; Schlechtweg PM; Neumann G; Wu IY; Bautz W; Hennig FF; Richter H
    Emerg Med J; 2006 Nov; 23(11):850-3. PubMed ID: 17057136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstations.
    Jervis SE; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):648-52. PubMed ID: 14500280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.
    Wang J; Anderson J; Lane T; Stetson C; Moore J
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):162-7. PubMed ID: 10847389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems.
    Gray JE
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Feb; 5(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 1554759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Becker SH; Arenson RL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1994; 1(5):361-71. PubMed ID: 7850560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Picture archiving and communication system in Hokkaido University Hospital: advantage and disadvantage of HU-PACS chest roentgenogram images in the outpatient clinic.
    Miyamoto K; Abe S; Kawakami Y
    J Digit Imaging; 1991 Nov; 4(4 Suppl 1):28-31. PubMed ID: 1772923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Filmless magnetic resonance tomography. Advantages and disadvantages in comparison with film reports].
    Vorbeck F; al-Zayer F; Jung B; Breitenseher M; Imhof H
    Radiologe; 1999 Apr; 39(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 10337696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
    Seto E; Ursani A; Cafazzo JA; Rossos PG; Easty AC
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 15988625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Acceptance analysis of a digital picture distribution in a filmless university hospital].
    Fründ R; Jähnig V; Strotzer M; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Rofo; 2007 Feb; 179(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 17262243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the commercial color LCD and the medical monochrome LCD using randomized object test patterns.
    Wu J; Wu TH; Han RP; Chang SJ; Shih CT; Sun JY; Hsu SM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37769. PubMed ID: 22701534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Success with Web-based image access.
    Harrison SW
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 12800563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Workstation scheme and implementation for a medical imaging information system.
    Tao Y; Miao J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 May; 116(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 12875671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.