BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15360786)

  • 1. Computerization of guidelines: a knowledge specification method to convert text to detailed decision tree for electronic implementation.
    Aguirre-Junco AR; Colombet I; Zunino S; Jaulent MC; Leneveut L; Chatellier G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):115-9. PubMed ID: 15360786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic implementation of guidelines in the EsPeR system: a knowledge specification method.
    Colombet I; Aguirre-Junco AR; Zunino S; Jaulent MC; Leneveut L; Chatellier G
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):597-604. PubMed ID: 15921954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From paper-based to electronic guidelines: application to French guidelines.
    Gillois P; Chatellier G; Jaulent MC; Colombet I; Fieschi M; Degoulet P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):196-200. PubMed ID: 11604732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerization of guidelines: towards a "guideline markup language".
    Dart T; Xu Y; Chatellier G; Degoulet P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):186-90. PubMed ID: 11604730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enabling guidelines for computer-based decision support--process and tools.
    Moser W; Heller U; Gries FA; Engelbrecht R;
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):231-5. PubMed ID: 11604739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling data and knowledge in the EON guideline architecture.
    Tu SW; Musen MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):280-4. PubMed ID: 11604749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support.
    de Clercq PA; Blom JA; Korsten HH; Hasman A
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 May; 31(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 15182844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for specification of structured clinical content in electronic health records.
    Bernstein K; Bruun-Rasmussen M; Vingtoft S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():515-21. PubMed ID: 17108570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow.
    Tu SW; Musen MA; Shankar R; Campbell J; Hrabak K; McClay J; Huff SM; McClure R; Parker C; Rocha R; Abarbanel R; Beard N; Glasgow J; Mansfield G; Ram P; Ye Q; Mays E; Weida T; Chute CG; McDonald K; Molu D; Nyman MA; Scheitel S; Solbrig H; Zill DA; Goldstein MK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):174-8. PubMed ID: 15360798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ability of expert physicians to structure clinical guidelines: reality versus perception.
    Shalom E; Shahar Y; Taieb-Maimon M; Martins SB; Vaszar LT; Goldstein MK; Gutnik L; Lunenfeld E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1043-53. PubMed ID: 20367704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining risks estimations and clinical practice guidelines in a computer decision aid: a pilot study of the EsPeR system.
    Colombet I; Dart T; Leneveut L; Zunino S; Ménard J; Chatellier G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():525-30. PubMed ID: 14664040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic process for converting text-based guidelines into a linear algorithm for electronic implementation.
    Lobach DF; Kerner N
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():507-11. PubMed ID: 11079935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Workflow management systems for guideline implementation.
    Panzarasa S; Stefanelli M
    Neurol Sci; 2006 Jun; 27 Suppl 3():S245-9. PubMed ID: 16752059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abstraction and analysis of clinical guidance trees.
    Turner KJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Apr; 42(2):237-50. PubMed ID: 19032989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.
    Green CJ; Fortin P; Maclure M; Macgregor A; Robinson S
    Int J Med Inform; 2006 Dec; 75(12):818-28. PubMed ID: 16920013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handling expressiveness and comprehensibility requirements in GLIF3.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH; Patel VL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11604741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sharable representation of clinical guidelines in GLIF: relationship to the Arden Syntax.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Bernstam E; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
    J Biomed Inform; 2001 Jun; 34(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 11723699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects.
    Greenes RA; Peleg M; Boxwala A; Tu S; Patel V; Shortliffe EH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):201-5. PubMed ID: 11604733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hybrid specification, storage, retrieval and runtime application of clinical guidelines.
    Shahar Y
    Neurol Sci; 2006 Jun; 27 Suppl 3():S250-3. PubMed ID: 16752060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guideline development: focus on breast cancer screening in the EsPeR project.
    Dufour JC; Giorgi R; Fieschi D; Gouvernet J; Gillois P; Piana L; Degoulet P; Fieschi M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):439-43. PubMed ID: 11604778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.