BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15360930)

  • 1. Morpho-functional visualization of dynamic MR-mammography.
    Englmeier KH; Hellwig G; Griebel J; Delorme S; Siebert M; Brix G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):838-41. PubMed ID: 15360930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic MR-mammography in virtual reality.
    Englmeier KH; Hellwig G; Griebel J; Delorme S; Siebert M; Brix G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():72-8. PubMed ID: 15455867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphofunctional visualization of MR-mammography in virtual reality.
    Englmeier KH; Hellwig G; Griebel J; Delorme S; Siebert M; Brix G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():27-32. PubMed ID: 14663958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic MR mammography: three-dimensional real-time visualization of contrast enhancement in virtual reality.
    Hellwig G; Brix G; Griebel J; Lucht R; Delorme S; Siebert M; Engimeier KH
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1255-63. PubMed ID: 12449358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Dynamic MR mammography. Multidimensional visualization of contrast medium enhancement in virtual reality].
    Englmeier KH; Griebel J; Lucht R; Knopp M; Siebert M; Brix G
    Radiologe; 2000 Mar; 40(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 10789125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
    Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data.
    Twellmann T; Lichte O; Nattkemper TW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1256-66. PubMed ID: 16229413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subtraction of in-phase and opposed-phase images in dynamic MR mammography.
    Reichenbach JR; Hopfe J; Rauscher A; Wurdinger S; Kaiser WA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):565-75. PubMed ID: 15834904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
    Moon M; Cornfeld D; Weinreb J
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 May; 17(2):351-62. PubMed ID: 19406363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive bilateral breast MRI using projection reconstruction time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics.
    Ramsay E; Causer P; Hill K; Plewes D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 16892204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactive detection and visualization of breast lesions from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI volumes.
    Subramanian KR; Brockway JP; Carruthers WB
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Dec; 28(8):435-44. PubMed ID: 15541950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tracer kinetic analysis of signal time series from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Brix G; Lucht R; Griebel J
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Dec; 51(5-6):325-30. PubMed ID: 17155868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial and temporal resolution effects on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography.
    Aref M; Handbury JD; Xiuquan Ji J; Aref S; Wiener EC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):14-34. PubMed ID: 17222712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
    Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance findings in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: an Australian feasibility study.
    Peters G; Anderson J; Longman G; Thomson J; Taylor D; Bennett M; Wylie E; Goldblatt J; Chan A; Saunders C
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18373823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Jaeger HJ; Maderwald S; Muehler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 May; 66(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 17658235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accelerated bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D spiral breast MRI using TSENSE.
    Han M; Daniel BL; Hargreaves BA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1425-34. PubMed ID: 19025951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
    Armitage P; Behrenbruch C; Brady M; Moore N
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Aug; 9(4):315-29. PubMed ID: 15950895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in breast tumors with a deconvolution-based analysis of second-bolus T1-DCE data.
    Makkat S; Luypaert R; Sourbron S; Stadnik T; De Mey J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 25(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 17520720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.