These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15361036)
1. Institutional decision-making for medical device purchasing: evaluating patient safety. Keselman A; Tang X; Patel VL; Johnson TR; Zhang J Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1357-61. PubMed ID: 15361036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional decision-making to select patient care devices: identifying venues to promote patient safety. Keselman A; Patel VL; Johnson TR; Zhang J J Biomed Inform; 2003; 36(1-2):31-44. PubMed ID: 14552845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human factors engineering: a tool for medical device evaluation in hospital procurement decision-making. Ginsburg G J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 15896694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing the design phase of critical care devices: a cognitive approach. Malhotra S; Laxmisan A; Keselman A; Zhang J; Patel VL J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15694884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers. Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of a decision analysis model in multidisciplinary decision making. Crane VS; Gilliland M; Tuthill EL; Bruno C Hosp Pharm; 1991 Apr; 26(4):309-13, 319-22, 325 passim. PubMed ID: 10110244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisions about critical events in device-related scenarios as a function of expertise. Laxmisan A; Malhotra S; Keselman A; Johnson TR; Patel VL J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):200-12. PubMed ID: 15896693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heuristic evaluation of infusion pumps: implications for patient safety in Intensive Care Units. Graham MJ; Kubose TK; Jordan D; Zhang J; Johnson TR; Patel VL Int J Med Inform; 2004 Nov; 73(11-12):771-9. PubMed ID: 15491928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 25 simple steps to save patients' lives. Runy LA Trustee; 2005; 58(7):12-4, 19-21, 1. PubMed ID: 16134881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Attitudes to the use of a decision support method when introducing new medical technology at the University Hospital of Copenhagen]. Folkersen J; Pedersen PH Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(21):2069-74. PubMed ID: 16768926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology. Husch M; Sullivan C; Rooney D; Barnard C; Fotis M; Clarke J; Noskin G Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Apr; 14(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 15805451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human factors: should your medical devices require intensive care? Hyman WA Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2010 Jun; 22(2):233-41. PubMed ID: 20541072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. Langley A Adm Sci Q; 1989 Dec; 34(4):598-631. PubMed ID: 10304184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Making the purchase decision: factors other than price. Lyons DM Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1992 May; 13(4):55-62. PubMed ID: 10117380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early technology assessment of new medical devices. Pietzsch JB; Paté-Cornell ME Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 18218167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]