These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15361450)

  • 1. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: seeking a balance: response from the Department of Health and COREC.
    Pattison J; Stacey T
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):622. PubMed ID: 15361450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: ethics committees have important roles in research.
    Walsh DA; Hewitt M
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):623. PubMed ID: 15361452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: time has come to face research governance.
    Elliott TM
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):623-4. PubMed ID: 15361454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: research governance is about protection, not convenience.
    Denholm JT
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):623. PubMed ID: 15361453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: ask for help.
    Reid CM
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):624. PubMed ID: 15361459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. View from the research and development office.
    Soteriou T
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):281-2. PubMed ID: 15284156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obtaining archived pathological material for biomedical research.
    Basu S; Martin SW; Phillips RM; Puri R
    Lancet; 2003 Apr; 361(9366):1394. PubMed ID: 12711507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: practical example illustrates problems of ethical review of genetics.
    Morrison P
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):624. PubMed ID: 15361458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: good governance is needed.
    Caan W
    BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7466):623. PubMed ID: 15361451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?
    Ashcroft RE
    New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 15706668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reforming research ethics committees.
    Ashcroft RE; Newson AJ; Benn PM
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):587-8. PubMed ID: 16166110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The other face of research governance.
    Jones AM; Bamford B
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7460):280-1. PubMed ID: 15284155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. United Kingdom research governance strategy.
    Kerrison S; McNally N; Pollock AM
    BMJ; 2003 Sep; 327(7414):553-6. PubMed ID: 12958119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomedical research ethics.
    Iltis AS
    J Med Philos; 2002 Oct; 27(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 12461708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research Governance: a barrier to ethical research?
    Dumville JC; Watson J; Raynor P; Torgerson DJ
    QJM; 2004 Mar; 97(3):113-4. PubMed ID: 14976267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. UK plans ethical code to stop misuse of bio-research.
    Pincock S
    Lancet; 2003 Nov; 362(9396):1634. PubMed ID: 14631963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics committees: we all need research ethics committees.
    Addison GM
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):730. PubMed ID: 16565144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
    Kerrison S; Pollock AM
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 31(8):487-9. PubMed ID: 16076976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ethical bureaucracy.
    Martyn C
    QJM; 2003 May; 96(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 12702780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Ad Hoc Advisory Group's proposals for research ethics committees: a mixture of the timid, the revolutionary, and the bizarre.
    Dawson AJ
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Aug; 31(8):435-6. PubMed ID: 16076964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.