These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15362200)
1. The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Wu LD; Hahne HJ; Hassenpflug J J Zhejiang Univ Sci; 2004 Oct; 5(10):1270-8. PubMed ID: 15362200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs. Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs]. Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of manual rasping and robotic milling for short metaphyseal-fitting stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Lim SJ; Kim SM; Lim BH; Moon YW; Park YS Comput Aided Surg; 2013; 18(1-2):33-40. PubMed ID: 23253159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An integrated CAD/CAM/robotic milling method for custom cementless femoral prostheses. Wen-ming X; Ai-min W; Qi W; Chang-hua L; Jian-fei Z; Fang-fang X Med Eng Phys; 2015 Sep; 37(9):911-5. PubMed ID: 26210779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femoral cement extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty--an in vitro study comparing computer-assisted freehand-navigated cement removal to conventional cement extraction. Mumme T; Friedrich MJ; Rode H; Gravius S; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; de la Fuente M Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Dec; 60(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 26053005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic bone preparation does not increase cement penetration into the proximal femur: a matched-pair cadaver study comparing hand-broaching versus robotic bone preparation. Aldinger PR; Schneider M; Pritsch M; Kreutzer J; Becker CR; Breusch SJ Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Jun; 74(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 12899546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthogonal view analysis for evaluating the femoral component position of total hip implants in dogs using postoperative radiographs. Jehn CT; Bergh MS; Manley PA Vet Surg; 2003; 32(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 12692758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation]. Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Radermacher K; Mumme T Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 20476504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A-mode ultrasound-based intra-femoral bone cement detection and 3D reconstruction in RTHR. Heger S; Mumme T; Sellei R; De La Fuente M; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 17538789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral analysis of the sound produced during femoral broaching and implant insertion in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Whitwell G; Brockett CL; Young S; Stone M; Stewart TD Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Feb; 227(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 23513988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total hip arthroplasty with cementless cups and femoral head autografts for patients with hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis. Wu LD; Jin LB; Yan SG; Yang QS; Dai XS; Wang XH Chin J Traumatol; 2004 Oct; 7(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 15363221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction. Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements. Howard JL; Hui AJ; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Rorabeck CH J Arthroplasty; 2004 Apr; 19(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 15067636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A plasma-sprayed titanium proximal coating reduces the risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty. Miles B; Walter WL; Kolos E; Waters T; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Donohoo S; Ruys AJ Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 26407113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty. Hodgson A; Helmy N; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Inkpen KB; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Anglin C Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):713-24. PubMed ID: 18019459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study. Su EP; Sheehan M; Su SL J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 19056234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]