These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15362200)
21. Fluoroscopy-based 3-D reconstruction of femoral bone cement: a new approach for revision total hip replacement. de la Fuente M; Ohnsorge JA; Schkommodau E; Jetzki S; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):664-75. PubMed ID: 15825868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Primary rotatory stability of robot-assisted and manually implanted hip endoprosthesis stems]. Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J Unfallchirurg; 2004 Apr; 107(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 14999372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment. Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years. Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study. Audenaert E; De Smedt K; Gelaude F; Clijmans T; Pattyn C; Geebelen B Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 21916560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation. Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation. Kitada M; Sakai T; Murase T; Hanada T; Nakamura N; Sugano N Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 23460526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. Beaulé PE; Krismer M; Mayrhofer P; Wanner S; Le Duff M; Mattesich M; Stoeckl B; Amstutz HC; Biedermann R J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 May; 87(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 15855382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical outcome following robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a controlled and prospective study of seventy-one patients]. Siebel T; Käfer W Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 16118753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of proximal femoral osteoporosis on cementless hip arthroplasty: a short-term clinical analysis. Lou XF; Li YH; Lin XJ J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2007 Jan; 8(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 17173366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Customised femoral stems in osteopetrosis and the development of a guiding system for the preparation of an intramedullary cavity: a report of two cases. Benum P; Aamodt A; Nordsletten L J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Sep; 92(9):1303-5. PubMed ID: 20798453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How accurate is image-free computer navigation for hip resurfacing arthroplasty? An anatomical investigation. Schnurr C; Nessler J; Meyer C; Schild HH; Koebke J; König DP J Orthop Sci; 2009 Sep; 14(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 19802660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of femur and implant position on the radiographic assessment of total hip femoral implants in dogs. Jehn CT; Manley PA Vet Surg; 2002; 31(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 12094349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Intraoperative 3D reconstruction of the PMMA plug for computer-assisted revision of total hip arthroplasty based on 2D X-ray images]. Ohnsorge JA; de la Fuente M; Jetzki S; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 14551839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficient computational method for assessing the effects of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements. Bah MT; Nair PB; Taylor M; Browne M J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 21295306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Total hip arthroplasty in osteopetrosis using computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Egawa H; Nakano S; Hamada D; Sato R; Yasui N J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16376266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Mai KT; Verioti CA; Casey K; Slesarenko Y; Romeo L; Colwell CW Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Mar; 39(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 20463983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]