These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1536226)
1. Comparison of thermal injury zones in loop electrical and laser cervical excisional conization. Baggish MS; Barash F; Noel Y; Brooks M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 166(2):545-8. PubMed ID: 1536226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thermal tissue damage following laser and large loop conization of the cervix. Paraskevaidis E; Kitchener HC; Malamou-Mitsi V; Agnanti N; Lolis D Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Nov; 84(5):752-4. PubMed ID: 7936506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outpatient excisional management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. A prospective, randomized comparison between loop diathermy excision and laser excisional conization. Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe CN; Manning EA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 168(2):485-8. PubMed ID: 8438914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of specimens removed by CO2 laser conization and the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Wright TC; Richart RM; Ferenczy A; Koulos J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jan; 79(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 1727574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which is more painful? A randomized trial comparing loop with laser excision of the cervical transformation zone. Crompton AC; Johnson N Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Mar; 52(3):392-4. PubMed ID: 8157197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large-loop excision of the transformation zone: effect on the pathologic interpretation of resection margins. Montz FJ; Holschneider CH; Thompson LD Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):976-82. PubMed ID: 8497366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Laser use in the uterine cervix. CO2 or KTP laser]. Blümel B; Nieder J; Stefanovic O; Weise W Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):458-61. PubMed ID: 8967267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The status and distance of cone biopsy margins as a predictor of excision adequacy for endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Goldstein NS; Mani A Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jun; 109(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 9620030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outpatient cervical conization with the CO2 laser. Iversen T J Reprod Med; 1985 Aug; 30(8):607-9. PubMed ID: 4045834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Consequences and treatment of cervical stenoses after laser conization or loop electrosurgical excision]. Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Wertz JP; Cuénin C; Ritter J; Philippe E J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 9091546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of complications of laser and cold knife conization. Larsson G; Gullberg B; Grundsell H Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 6408545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conization with a carbon dioxide laser as a uterine-preservation operation for patients with preinvasive cervical carcinoma. Chen RJ; Hsieh CY; lee TY; Lee FE; Kao MC J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 May; 91(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 1358331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of conization in the therapy of carcinoma in situ]. Herzog RE Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 45(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 4007461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]