These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15363058)

  • 1. Cochrane systematic reviews of treatments for peripheral nerve disorders.
    Hughes RA; Jewitt KM; Swan AV
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2004 Sep; 9(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 15363058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: original data versus systematic reviews in the medical literature.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1265):U2804. PubMed ID: 18264184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer treatment reviews welcomes submission of the Cochrane Reviews.
    Pavlidis N; Stahel R; Clarke M; Djulbegovic B
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2006 Jun; 32(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 16713102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: a reply from a group producing systematic reviews.
    Weir R; Bidwell S
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2843. PubMed ID: 18264210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochrane systematic reviews: time for an introduction and appraisal.
    Ling W; Farrell M; Ali R
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2004 Mar; 73(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 15036543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.
    Scott I; Greenberg P; Poole P; Campbell D
    Intern Med J; 2006 Sep; 36(9):587-99. PubMed ID: 16911551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Leibovici L; Reeves D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):803-4. PubMed ID: 16166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial. Systematic review--what is it and how should it be used?
    Gross A
    Man Ther; 2004 Aug; 9(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 15245705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews.
    Maxwell L; Santesso N; Tugwell PS; Wells GA; Judd M; Buchbinder R
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Nov; 33(11):2304-11. PubMed ID: 17086611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrapartum amnioinfusion for meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
    Sanchez-Ramos L
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):409-10; author reply 410. PubMed ID: 18190380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
    Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews and the Cochrane collaboration.
    Kale R; Silagy C
    Natl Med J India; 1996; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 8713515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advancing research through systematic reviews and meta-analysis: workshop experience.
    Alam AY; Zaidi Z; Rahim F; Qureshi AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 May; 18(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 18541096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An encouraging assessment of methods to inform priorities for updating systematic reviews.
    Sutton AJ; Donegan S; Takwoingi Y; Garner P; Gamble C; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18783919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.