218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15363371)
1. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?
Button G; Pinney S
Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Aug; 25(8):521-5. PubMed ID: 15363371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.
Ibrahim T; Beiri A; Azzabi M; Best AJ; Taylor GJ; Menon DK
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 17331864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes.
Baumhauer JF; Nawoczenski DA; DiGiovanni BF; Wilding GE
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1014-9. PubMed ID: 17207425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery.
Parker J; Nester CJ; Long AF; Barrie J
Foot Ankle Int; 2003 Jan; 24(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12540083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
Garcés JB; Winson I; Goldhahn S; Castro MD; Swords MP; Grujic L; Rammelt S; Sands AK
Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 26869503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members.
Lau JT; Mahomed NM; Schon LC
Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Jun; 26(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 15960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; translation and validation of the Dutch language version for ankle fractures.
de Boer AS; Tjioe RJC; Van der Sijde F; Meuffels DE; den Hoed PT; Van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; Verhofstad MHJ; Van Lieshout EMM;
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017040. PubMed ID: 28775193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.
Kim JB; Kim JK; Seo SG; Lee DY
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25441847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36.
SooHoo NF; Shuler M; Fleming LL;
Foot Ankle Int; 2003 Jan; 24(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 12540082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research.
Hunt KJ; Hurwit D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 95(16):e118(1-9). PubMed ID: 23965711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 5-Year Review of Clinical Outcome Measures Published in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery®.
Hasenstein T; Greene T; Meyr AJ
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(3):519-521. PubMed ID: 28476386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale.
Niki H; Aoki H; Inokuchi S; Ozeki S; Kinoshita M; Kura H; Tanaka Y; Noguchi M; Nomura S; Hatori M; Tatsunami S
J Orthop Sci; 2005 Sep; 10(5):466-74. PubMed ID: 16193357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Tests Against the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for 6 Common Foot and Ankle Pathologies.
Koltsov JCB; Greenfield ST; Soukup D; Do HT; Ellis SJ
Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Aug; 38(8):870-878. PubMed ID: 28602138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.
Niki H; Aoki H; Inokuchi S; Ozeki S; Kinoshita M; Kura H; Tanaka Y; Noguchi M; Nomura S; Hatori M; Tatsunami S
J Orthop Sci; 2005 Sep; 10(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 16193356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity.
Mani SB; Brown HC; Nair P; Chen L; Do HT; Lyman S; Deland JT; Ellis SJ
Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1140-6. PubMed ID: 23513031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
Foot (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 21(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 21602039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery.
Malviya A; Makwana N; Laing P
Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 17475146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 5-Year Review of Clinical Outcome Measures Published in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery.
Hasenstein T; Greene T; Meyr AJ
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 May; 107(3):176-179. PubMed ID: 28463018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 22323689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
