These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15363738)

  • 1. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S232-5. PubMed ID: 15363738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender selection for nonmedical indications.
    Gleicher N; Karande V
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Sep; 78(3):460-2. PubMed ID: 12215316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1418-22. PubMed ID: 25956364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender choice: is it playing God?
    O'Keefe M
    Christ Century; 2004 May; 121(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 15543673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2001 May; 75(5):861-4. PubMed ID: 11334894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender "tailored" conceptions: should the option of embryo gender selection be available to infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology?
    Merhi ZO; Pal L
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):590-3. PubMed ID: 18667646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5 Suppl 1):S53-6. PubMed ID: 17055846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproduction and gender selection: "why boys?".
    Confino E; Kazer RR; Zhang JX
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 16596902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex selection by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for nonmedical reasons in contemporary Israeli regulations.
    Grazi RV; Wolowelsky JB; Krieger DJ
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2008; 17(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 18495069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A boy or a girl? A Hungarian survey regarding gender selection.
    Fejes I; Szöllosi J; Závaczki Z; Koloszár S; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(8):993-6. PubMed ID: 16862481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human immunodeficiency virus and infertility treatment.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82 Suppl 1():S228-31. PubMed ID: 15363737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Community concerns about sex selection: research as a way forward - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'.
    McMahon CA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 15038893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A boy or a girl? The ethics of preconception gender selection.
    Flug J
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 2004; (48):5-27. PubMed ID: 15540377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection.
    McDougall R
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 31(10):601-5. PubMed ID: 16199604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preconception sex selection demand and preferences in the United States.
    Dahl E; Gupta RS; Beutel M; Stoebel-Richter Y; Brosig B; Tinneberg HR; Jain T
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):468-73. PubMed ID: 16595229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Australian attitudes toward sex-selection technology.
    Kippen R; Evans A; Gray E
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Apr; 95(5):1824-6. PubMed ID: 21163475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Swimming upstream: views on the ethics of preconception gender selection.
    Mastroianni L
    J Androl; 1999; 20(3):332-5. PubMed ID: 10386811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HFEA's public consultation on sex selection.
    Dahl E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Mar; 8(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 15038888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender preferences and demand for preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in Pakistan.
    Zubair F; Dahl E; Sher Shah S; Ahmed M; Brosig B
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 17062579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physicians must not help parents decide the gender of their unborn child: the case against preconception gender selection.
    Ravindran GD
    Natl Med J India; 2003; 16(2):92-3. PubMed ID: 12816188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.