296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15366155)
1. Thrash it out.
New Sci; 2001 Jan; 169(2272):3. PubMed ID: 15366155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cloning and stem cells--handicapping the political and scientific debates.
Daley GQ
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 12867604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning?
MacKellar C
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Great expectations.
Coghlan A; Young E
New Sci; 2001 Jan; 169(2272):9. PubMed ID: 15366156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee.
Brownsword R
Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cloning and government regulation.
Greely H
Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1085-96. PubMed ID: 15508218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cloning, science and public policy.
Ortiz D
Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 15508220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Placing a moratorium on research cloning to ensure effective control over reproductive cloning.
Capron AM
Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1057-72. PubMed ID: 15508216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK.
Sexton S
Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. International stem cell use and regulation in research.
Lin L
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 16538804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bankrolling stem-cell research with California dollars.
Yamamoto KR
N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1711-3. PubMed ID: 15496617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryonic stem cell research: will President Bush's limitation on federal funding put the United States at a disadvantage? A comparison between U.S. and international law.
Stevens D
Houst J Int Law; 2003; 25(3):623-53. PubMed ID: 15199940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Engineering consent.
Sexton S
Splice Life; 2001; 7(2-3):12-3. PubMed ID: 12564463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. English lab ready to clone embryos for stem cells.
Hall SS
N Y Times Web; 2004 Oct; ():F2. PubMed ID: 15487064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scramble over stem cells: Britain moves to establish first embryo stem-cell bank to supply limited lines.
Naik G
Wall St J (East Ed); 2001 Aug; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 12159908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science policy and the law: reproductive and therapeutic cloning.
Knowles LP
N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy; 2000-2001; 4(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 15011709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Loophole legalizes human cloning.
Adam D
Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6862):381. PubMed ID: 11719761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. House of Lords rejects challenge to therapeutic cloning.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):23. PubMed ID: 14964208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.N. to consider whether to ban some, or all, forms of cloning of human embryos.
Semple K
N Y Times Web; 2003 Nov; ():A11. PubMed ID: 14621711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
