These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15366485)

  • 1. [Early detection of breast cancer. Is digital mammography more sensitive? (interview by Dr. Thomas Meissner)].
    Langer M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Jun; 146(24):12. PubMed ID: 15366485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Characterization of a cluster of microcalcifications on digital mammography: back to basic concepts].
    Taourel P
    J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 91(9 Pt 1):837-8. PubMed ID: 20814372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital imaging in the surgical detection of breast neoplasms].
    Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Carli L; Cagini L
    G Chir; 1993 Dec; 14(9):483-7. PubMed ID: 8167081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
    Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of wavelet analysis for contrast enhancement in mammography.
    Sakellaropoulos P; Costaridou L; Cavouras D; Bezerianos A; Panayiotakis G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():502-6. PubMed ID: 10179716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
    Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Imaging diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Fujimitsu R; Okazaki M; Ida M
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():235-40. PubMed ID: 17682160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital mammography.
    D'Orsi CJ
    Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Apr; 2(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12116601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
    Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital luminescence mammography. Early clinical experience.
    Jarlman O; Samuelsson L; Braw M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 2031792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
    Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comments on the article "Focus measurement and geometric lack of focus in mammography equipment"].
    Andersson O
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Nov; 4(6):351-2. PubMed ID: 7819303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16741664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparing the visualization of microcalcifications with direct magnification in digital full-field mammography vs. film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bick U; Rogalla P; Blohmer JU; Winzer KJ; Hamm B
    Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 11885006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.
    Wang TC; Karayiannis NB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.