218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15367182)
21. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.
De Rouck T; Eghbali R; Collys K; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19419444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of a conventional probe with electronic and manual pressure-regulated probes.
Perry DA; Taggart EJ; Leung A; Newburn E
J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 7823271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement using a constant-force electronic probe: analysis of inter- and intraexaminer variability.
Araujo MW; Hovey KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-40. PubMed ID: 14974813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?
Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlation of periodontal probe penetration and degree of inflammation.
Anderson GB; Caffesse RG; Nasjleti CE; Smith BA
Am J Dent; 1991 Aug; 4(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 1930842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.
Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison between measurements made with a conventional periodontal pocket probe, an electronic pressure probe and measurements made at surgery.
Galgut PN; Waite IM
Int Dent J; 1990 Dec; 40(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 2276830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in keratinized tissue width assessment with 3 methods for mucogingival junction determination.
Guglielmoni P; Promsudthi A; Tatakis DN; Trombelli L
J Periodontol; 2001 Feb; 72(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 11288784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Comparative study of the measured values of different periodontal probes].
Gruber I; Han Y; Sonnabend E
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):665-7. PubMed ID: 1817857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Periodontal probes and probing.
Hunter F
Int Dent J; 1994 Oct; 44(5 Suppl 1):577-83. PubMed ID: 7836013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Periodontal probe precision using 4 different periodontal probes.
Mayfield L; Bratthall G; Attström R
J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Feb; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 8849842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of general health and sociocultural variables on periodontal status of pregnant women.
Sarlati F; Akhondi N; Jahanbakhsh N
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2004 Jul; 6(3):95-100. PubMed ID: 15368876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement.
Kan JY; Morimoto T; Rungcharassaeng K; Roe P; Smith DH
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Jun; 30(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 20386780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Examiner alignment and assessment in clinical periodontal research.
Hefti AF; Preshaw PM
Periodontol 2000; 2012 Jun; 59(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 22507059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
