120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15367198)
1. Evaluation of a new periodontal probe tip design. A clinical and in vitro study.
Vartoukian SR; Palmer RM; Wilson RF
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):918-25. PubMed ID: 15367198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients.
Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 16553636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An assessment of the validity of a constant force electronic probe in measuring probing depths.
Hull PS; Clerehugh V; Ghassemi-Aval A
J Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 66(10):848-51. PubMed ID: 8537866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological location of a standardized periodontal probe in man.
Aguero A; Garnick JJ; Keagle J; Steflik DE; Thompson WO
J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 7776162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probe penetration in periodontal and peri-implant tissues. An experimental study in the beagle dog.
Abrahamsson I; Soldini C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17092216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Periodontal probing: probe tip diameter.
Garnick JJ; Silverstein L
J Periodontol; 2000 Jan; 71(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 10695944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between position of probe tip and periodontal tissues after periodontal surgery in dogs.
Hatakeyama Y; Uzel MI; Santana RB; Ruben MP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Jun; 25(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 16001737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
Rams TE; Slots J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Periodontal probes and probing.
Hunter F
Int Dent J; 1994 Oct; 44(5 Suppl 1):577-83. PubMed ID: 7836013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved diagnostics: clinical evaluation of a color-coded, polymeric periodontal probe.
Kazmierczak MD; Ciancio SG; Mather M; Dangler LV; Troullos ES
Clin Prev Dent; 1992; 14(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 1521399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of the cemento-enamel junction with three different probes: an "in vitro" model.
Barendregt DS; van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; Bulthuis HM; van der Weijden F
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Mar; 36(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 19196382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement by an experimental periodontal probe incorporating optical fiber sensor.
Ishihata K; Wakabayashi N; Wadachi J; Akizuki T; Izumi Y; Takakuda K; Igarashi Y
J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 21574830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A thin or thick probe handle: does it make a difference?
van Weringh M; Barendregt DS; Rosema NA; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
Int J Dent Hyg; 2006 Aug; 4(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 16958742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bleeding on probing and pocket probing depth in relation to probing pressure and mucosal health around oral implants.
Gerber JA; Tan WC; Balmer TE; Salvi GE; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 19126110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
