BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15367198)

  • 21. Millimeter marks and probe tip diameter standardisation from commercially available periodontal probes. A comparative study.
    Neto JB; Filho GR; Tramontina VA; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Sallum AW
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 3(3):57-60. PubMed ID: 12666942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity of a hinged constant force probe and a similar, immobilised probe in untreated periodontal disease.
    Simons P; Watts T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Nov; 14(10):581-7. PubMed ID: 3480294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical attachment level measurements with and without the use of a stent by a computerized electronic probe.
    Machion L; Andia DC; Nociti Júnior FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2007 Apr; 9(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 17506385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical efficacy of semiconductor laser application as an adjunct to conventional scaling and root planing.
    Kreisler M; Al Haj H; d'Hoedt B
    Lasers Surg Med; 2005 Dec; 37(5):350-5. PubMed ID: 16365890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproducibility of peri-implant probing using a force-controlled probe.
    Eickholz P; Grotkamp FL; Steveling H; Mühling J; Staehle HJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Apr; 12(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 11251665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Periodontal probing: what does it mean?
    Listgarten MA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1980 Jun; 7(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 7000852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative probing with an electronic and a manual periodontal probe].
    Becherer CF; Rateitschak KH; Hefti AF
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 8322056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The accuracy of the Vivacare true pressure-sensitive periodontal probe system in terms of probing force.
    Bergenholtz A; al-Harbi N; al-Hummayani FM; Anton P; al-Kahtani S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 27(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10703653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Periodontal probing depth measurement: a review.
    Khan S; Cabanilla LL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009; 30(1):12-4, 16, 18-21; quiz 22, 36. PubMed ID: 19263761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of calculus and irrigator tip design on depth of subgingival irrigation.
    Larner JR; Greenstein G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993; 13(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 8262724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants.
    Pecora GE; Ceccarelli R; Bonelli M; Alexander H; Ricci JL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 19212238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of a conventional probe with electronic and manual pressure-regulated probes.
    Perry DA; Taggart EJ; Leung A; Newburn E
    J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 7823271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva.
    De Rouck T; Eghbali R; Collys K; De Bruyn H; Cosyn J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 19419444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pain experienced by patients during periodontal recall examination using thinner versus thicker probes.
    Hassan MA; Bogle G; Quishenbery M; Stephens D; Riggs M; Egelberg J
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 15948694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An investigation of the validity of attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
    Ahmed N; Watts TL; Wilson RF
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 8783050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reproducibility of attachment level recordings using an electronic and a conventional probe.
    Villata L; Baelum V
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1292-300. PubMed ID: 8997676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
    Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
    J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Smokers have less reductions in probing depth than non-smokers following nonsurgical periodontal therapy.
    Garcia RI
    Evid Based Dent; 2005; 6(2):37-8. PubMed ID: 16208387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe--the Florida probe.
    Gibbs CH; Hirschfeld JW; Lee JG; Low SB; Magnusson I; Thousand RR; Yerneni P; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Feb; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 3162246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.