These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15367517)
1. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation. Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Edwards MB; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW; Van Herwerden LA; Taylor KM; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ Heart; 2004 Oct; 90(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 15367517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Markov series and Monte Carlo simulation in predicting replacement valve performances. de Kruyk AR; van der Meulen JH; van Herwerden LA; Bekkers JA; Steyerberg EW; Dekker R; Habbema JD J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jan; 7(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 9502132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51 to 65 years at implantation. Perchinsky M; Henderson C; Jamieson WR; Anderson WN; Lamy A; Lowe N; de Guzman S Circulation; 1998 Nov; 98(19 Suppl):II81-6; discussion II86-7. PubMed ID: 9852886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A case report: Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis malfunction due to the stent dehiscence at 17 years after the implantation in the mitral position]. Hayashi K; Nakano H; Sakamoto T; Okamura H Kyobu Geka; 2000 Jan; 53(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 10639799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis: predictions based on meta-analysis and microsimulation. Puvimanasinghe JP; Steyerberg EW; Takkenberg JJ; Eijkemans MJ; van Herwerden LA; Bogers AJ; Habbema JD Circulation; 2001 Mar; 103(11):1535-41. PubMed ID: 11257081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Selection criteria for aortic valve prostheses: mechanical, stented, or stentless valve or homograft?]. Koyanagi T; Minami K; Koerfer R Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Nov; 99(11):789-93. PubMed ID: 10028500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heart valves from pigs and the porcine endogenous retrovirus: experimental and clinical data to assess the probability of porcine endogenous retrovirus infection in human subjects. Moza AK; Mertsching H; Herden T; Bader A; Haverich A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 121(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 11279410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hufnagel procedure reconverted by endovascular leaflet dislocation and extirpation. Van Nooten GJ; Taeymans Y; Verdonck P J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Sep; 6(5):546-9. PubMed ID: 9330179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamic comparison of Medtronic intact bioprostheses and bileaflet mechanical prostheses in aortic position. Ricou F; Brun A; Lerch R Cardiology; 1996; 87(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 8725316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]