These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis. Kimmelman J; Palmour N J Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; 31(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 15800361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Ethics of research: the freedom to withdraw]. de Cenival M Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2008 Apr; 101(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 18543700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Varieties of uncertainty and the validity of informed consent. Weinfurt KP Clin Trials; 2008; 5(6):624-5; discussion 630. PubMed ID: 19029211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Research ethics guidelines: partly different requirements in various types of trials]. Nilstun T; Löfmark R Lakartidningen; 2005 Oct 10-16; 102(41):2932-4, 2937. PubMed ID: 16294510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Informed consent in human gene transfer clinical trials. Kahn J Hum Gene Ther; 2008 Jan; 19(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 18211226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Waiver of consent in clinical observational research. Lertsithichai P J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 15962683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethical dilemmas in clinical research with human subjects: an investigator's perspective. Lieberman JA Psychopharmacol Bull; 1996; 32(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 8927670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research. Orentlicher D Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Some questionable premises about research ethics. Macklin R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Informed consent for research in Borderline Personality Disorder. Dew RE BMC Med Ethics; 2007 May; 8():4. PubMed ID: 17493277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of informed consent: a pilot study. Länsimies-Antikainen H; Pietilä AM; Laitinen T; Schwab U; Rauramaa R; Länsimies E J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jul; 59(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 17543012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unconditional compensation: reducing the costs of disagreement about compensation for research subjects. Sofaer N; Jafarey A; Lei RP; Zhang X; Wikler D East Mediterr Health J; 2007; 13(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 17546900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Research subject advocates: to whom are they loyal? Bramstedt KA Clin Invest Med; 2003 Apr; 26(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 12722838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects. Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical research ethics in Thailand: what should be the most appropriate approach? An analysis based on Western ethical principles. Lertsithichai P J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 15560707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The moral primacy of the human being. Parker C J Med Ethics; 2010 Sep; 36(9):563-6. PubMed ID: 20693483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ethical issues of recruitment and enrollment of critically ill and injured patients for research. Richmond TS; Ulrich C AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(4):352-5. PubMed ID: 17978608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]