These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15368037)
1. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Dark PM; Singer M Intensive Care Med; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2060-6. PubMed ID: 15368037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Monitoring cardiac output: esophageal doppler vs thermodilution]. Leone D; Servillo G; De Robertis E; Rossano F; Tufano R Minerva Anestesiol; 1998; 64(7-8):351-6. PubMed ID: 9796245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output in critically ill patients using transesophageal Doppler. Valtier B; Cholley BP; Belot JP; de la Coussaye JE; Mateo J; Payen DM Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1998 Jul; 158(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 9655710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Møller-Sørensen H; Cordtz J; Østergaard M; Nilsson JC; Hansen KL J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 26578096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. Lefrant JY; Bruelle P; Aya AG; Saïssi G; Dauzat M; de La Coussaye JE; Eledjam JJ Intensive Care Med; 1998 Apr; 24(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 9609413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transoesophageal echocardiography accurately detects cardiac output variation: a prospective comparison with thermodilution in cardiac surgery. Parra V; Fita G; Rovira I; Matute P; Gomar C; Paré C Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 17672920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cardiac outputs of major burn patients undergoing extensive early escharectomy: esophageal Doppler monitor versus thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter. Kim K; Kwok I; Chang H; Han T J Trauma; 2004 Nov; 57(5):1013-7. PubMed ID: 15580025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oesophageal Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of haemodynamic status of patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit with septic shock. Chew HC; Devanand A; Phua GC; Loo CM Ann Acad Med Singap; 2009 Aug; 38(8):699-703. PubMed ID: 19736574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement. Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurements of cardiac output obtained with transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery thermodilution are not interchangeable. Møller-Sørensen H; Graeser K; Hansen KL; Zemtsovski M; Sander EM; Nilsson JC Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2014 Jan; 58(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 24192143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of esophageal Doppler as a minimally invasive hemodynamic monitor: a review. Laupland KB; Bands CJ Can J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 49(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 11927480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Echo is a good, not perfect, measure of cardiac output in critically ill surgical patients. Olivieri PP; Patel R; Kolb S; Fatima S; Galvagno SM; Haase DJ; Ramani GV; Ludmir J; Alkhatib H; Herr D; Bruno DA; Scalea TM; Murthi SB J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2019 Aug; 87(2):379-385. PubMed ID: 31349350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods]. Zheng ML; Sun X; Zhong J; He SR; Pan W; Pang CC; Sun YX; Liu YM Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques. Lefrant JY; Bruelle P; Ripart J; Ibanez F; Aya G; Peray P; Saïssi G; de La Coussaye JE; Eledjam JJ Can J Anaesth; 1995 Nov; 42(11):972-6. PubMed ID: 8590506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]