BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15368196)

  • 1. A powerful and robust new linkage statistic for discordant sibling pairs.
    Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Nov; 75(5):906-9. PubMed ID: 15368196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QTL mapping with discordant and concordant sibling pairs: new statistics and new design strategies.
    Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 May; 28(4):326-40. PubMed ID: 15662636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for selected sibling pairs.
    T Cuenco K; Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Oct; 73(4):863-73. PubMed ID: 12970847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.
    Forrest WF; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1642-60. PubMed ID: 10762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for discordant sibling pairs.
    Szatkiewicz JP; T Cuenco K; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Oct; 73(4):874-85. PubMed ID: 12970846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Score test for age at onset genetic linkage analysis in selected sibling pairs.
    Callegaro A; van Houwelingen HC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1913-26. PubMed ID: 19402027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias toward the null hypothesis in model-free linkage analysis is highly dependent on the test statistic used.
    Cordell HJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15124101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for linkage under robust genetic models.
    Guerra R; Wan Y; Jia A; Amos CI; Cohen JC
    Hum Hered; 1999 Jun; 49(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 10364679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust score statistics for QTL linkage analysis.
    Bhattacharjee S; Kuo CL; Mukhopadhyay N; Brock GN; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2008 Mar; 82(3):567-82. PubMed ID: 18304491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis of X-linked traits in general pedigrees.
    Song KK; Feingold E; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Jan; 70(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 11719901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of discordant sibling pairs for finding genetic loci linked to obesity: practical considerations.
    Allison DB
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1996 Jun; 20(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8782732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel framework for sib pair linkage analysis.
    Poznik GD; Adamska K; Xu X; Krolewski AS; Rogus JJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Feb; 78(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 16358216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transmission-ratio distortion and allele sharing in affected sib pairs: a new linkage statistic with reduced bias, with application to chromosome 6q25.3.
    Lemire M; Roslin NM; Laprise C; Hudson TJ; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):571-86. PubMed ID: 15322985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping quantitative trait loci using multiple phenotypes in general pedigrees.
    Wang K
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 12890921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power and robustness of linkage tests for quantitative traits in general pedigrees.
    Chen WM; Broman KW; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 28(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 15493059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.
    Schaid DJ; Nick TG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 2253870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.
    Davis S; Schroeder M; Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to model a complex trait. 2. Analysis with two disease loci.
    Strauch K; Fimmers R; Baur MP; Wienker TF
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(4):200-11. PubMed ID: 15031621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Models and tests of linkage and association studies of quantitative trait locus for multi-allele marker Loci.
    Fan R; Floros J; Xiong M
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 12145549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.