These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15368623)
1. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures. Menovsky T; Bartels RH; van Lindert EL; Grotenhuis JA Hand Surg; 2004 Jul; 9(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15368623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery. Wade RG; Wormald JC; Figus A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD011757. PubMed ID: 29390170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. Theopold C; Potter S; Dempsey M; O'Shaughnessy M J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 May; 37(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 21987279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel. Tzimas V; Kotsias C; Galanis C; Panagiotakopoulos G; Tsiampas D; Parnis J; Tilkeridis K; Fiska A Scars Burn Heal; 2022; 8():20595131221128951. PubMed ID: 36200049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial. Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of Monocryl versus nylon sutures on patient- and observer-assessed outcomes following carpal tunnel surgery. Wu E; Allen R; Bayne C; Szabo R J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2023 Nov; 48(10):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 37293819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery. Matalia J; Panmand P; Ghalla P Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):661-664. PubMed ID: 29676310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release. Kharwadkar N; Naique S; Molitor PJ J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 30(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 15620502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites. Gabel EA; Jimenez GP; Eaglstein WH; Kerdel FA; Falanga V Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):750-2; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 10940061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of 7/0 Vicryl (coated polyglactin 910) and 7/0 Vicryl-rapide (irradiated polyglactin 910) in skin closure in ophthalmic plastic surgery. Talbot AW; Meadows AE; Tyers AG; Shah-Desai S Orbit; 2002 Mar; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12029576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome and cost comparison of carpal tunnel wound closure with monocryl and ethilon: a prospective study. Dosani A; Khan SK; Gray S; Joseph S; Whittaker IA Hand Surg; 2013; 18(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 24164122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single interrupted sutures compared with Donati sutures after open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomised trial. Bolster M; Schipper C; Van Sterkenburg S; Ruettermann M; Reijnen M J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Sep; 47(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 23710789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcome and wound healing following carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two common suture materials. MacFarlane RJ; Donnelly TD; Khan Y; Morapudi S; Waseem M; Fischer J Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():270137. PubMed ID: 25165693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suture Selection for Incision Closure in Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Dilemma for Pediatric Ophthalmologists. Agarwal P; Maan V; Sutar S; Chauhan L J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2022; 59(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 35076313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Skin closure in inguinal hernia repair with rapidly absorbing Polyglactin 910/370 (Vicryl-Rapide) suture material]. Szabó S; István G Magy Seb; 2002 Apr; 55(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12049012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reaction of the rabbit corneal endothelium to nylon sutures. A SEM study. Jongebloed WL; van der Veen G; Kalicharan D; Rijneveld WJ; Houtman WA; Worst JG Doc Ophthalmol; 1990 Oct; 75(3-4):351-8. PubMed ID: 2090411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of nylon, vicryl, and fibrin glue for nerve grafting in rats. Hanna AS; Mickelson E; Omar AH; Baer M; Sveum J; Marti T; Mishra R; Trudrung M; Hutchinson J; Attaluri P; Jacobs A; Ott E; Martinson N; Jones J; Hellenbrand D Neurol Res; 2024 Oct; 46(10):972-981. PubMed ID: 39007696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in corporeal plication for treatment of congenital penile curvature. Basiri A; Sarhangnejad R; Ghahestani SM; Radfar MH Urol J; 2011; 8(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 22090050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Theopold C, Potter S, Dempsey M, O'Shaughnessy M. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012; 37: 350-3. Freshwater MF J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 Sep; 37(7):705; author reply 705-6. PubMed ID: 22879647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression. Erel E; Pleasance PI; Ahmed O; Hart NB J Hand Surg Br; 2001 Apr; 26(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 11281671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]