209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15368623)
1. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures.
Menovsky T; Bartels RH; van Lindert EL; Grotenhuis JA
Hand Surg; 2004 Jul; 9(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15368623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release.
Theopold C; Potter S; Dempsey M; O'Shaughnessy M
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 May; 37(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 21987279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.
Wade RG; Wormald JC; Figus A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD011757. PubMed ID: 29390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel.
Tzimas V; Kotsias C; Galanis C; Panagiotakopoulos G; Tsiampas D; Parnis J; Tilkeridis K; Fiska A
Scars Burn Heal; 2022; 8():20595131221128951. PubMed ID: 36200049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial.
Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of Monocryl versus nylon sutures on patient- and observer-assessed outcomes following carpal tunnel surgery.
Wu E; Allen R; Bayne C; Szabo R
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2023 Nov; 48(10):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 37293819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery.
Matalia J; Panmand P; Ghalla P
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):661-664. PubMed ID: 29676310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release.
Kharwadkar N; Naique S; Molitor PJ
J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 30(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 15620502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites.
Gabel EA; Jimenez GP; Eaglstein WH; Kerdel FA; Falanga V
Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):750-2; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 10940061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of 7/0 Vicryl (coated polyglactin 910) and 7/0 Vicryl-rapide (irradiated polyglactin 910) in skin closure in ophthalmic plastic surgery.
Talbot AW; Meadows AE; Tyers AG; Shah-Desai S
Orbit; 2002 Mar; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12029576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome and cost comparison of carpal tunnel wound closure with monocryl and ethilon: a prospective study.
Dosani A; Khan SK; Gray S; Joseph S; Whittaker IA
Hand Surg; 2013; 18(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 24164122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single interrupted sutures compared with Donati sutures after open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomised trial.
Bolster M; Schipper C; Van Sterkenburg S; Ruettermann M; Reijnen M
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Sep; 47(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 23710789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcome and wound healing following carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two common suture materials.
MacFarlane RJ; Donnelly TD; Khan Y; Morapudi S; Waseem M; Fischer J
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():270137. PubMed ID: 25165693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suture Selection for Incision Closure in Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Dilemma for Pediatric Ophthalmologists.
Agarwal P; Maan V; Sutar S; Chauhan L
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2022; 59(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 35076313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Skin closure in inguinal hernia repair with rapidly absorbing Polyglactin 910/370 (Vicryl-Rapide) suture material].
Szabó S; István G
Magy Seb; 2002 Apr; 55(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12049012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reaction of the rabbit corneal endothelium to nylon sutures. A SEM study.
Jongebloed WL; van der Veen G; Kalicharan D; Rijneveld WJ; Houtman WA; Worst JG
Doc Ophthalmol; 1990 Oct; 75(3-4):351-8. PubMed ID: 2090411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in corporeal plication for treatment of congenital penile curvature.
Basiri A; Sarhangnejad R; Ghahestani SM; Radfar MH
Urol J; 2011; 8(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 22090050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Theopold C, Potter S, Dempsey M, O'Shaughnessy M. A randomised controlled trial of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012; 37: 350-3.
Freshwater MF
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 Sep; 37(7):705; author reply 705-6. PubMed ID: 22879647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression.
Erel E; Pleasance PI; Ahmed O; Hart NB
J Hand Surg Br; 2001 Apr; 26(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 11281671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery: is there a clinical difference?
Daniilidis K; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ettinger S; Claassen L; Plaass C; Lerch M; Waizy H; Martinelli N; Yao D
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 31055725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
