These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15369470)

  • 1. Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems.
    Botega DM; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):884-9. PubMed ID: 15369470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis.
    de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 18548962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
    Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures.
    Svetlize CA; Bodereau EF
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 15202589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading.
    Gamborena JI; Hazelton LR; NaBadalung D; Brudvik J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 9206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retentive force of O-ring attachment to use Immediate Provisional Implant (IPI)-retained overdenture.
    Kobayashi M; Ohkubo C; Suzuki Y; Aoki T; Sato J; Hosoi T
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Dec; 13(4):147-9. PubMed ID: 16411569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis (FEA) studies in 2.5-mm round bar design: the effects of bar length and material composition on bar failure.
    Bidez MW; Chen Y; McLoughlin SW; English CE
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1289549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro investigation into retention strength and fatigue resistance of various designs of tooth/implant supported overdentures.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 32(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 22282258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Special technique for attachment incorporation with an implant overdenture.
    Sadig WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 12589297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment.
    Rodrigues RC; Faria AC; Macedo AP; Sartori IA; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1314-9. PubMed ID: 19681968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.