467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15369521)
1. Auditory dominance and its change in the course of development.
Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
Child Dev; 2004; 75(5):1387-401. PubMed ID: 15369521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli in children and adults.
Droit-Volet S; Tourret S; Wearden J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):797-818. PubMed ID: 15204118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory-visual speech integration by prelinguistic infants: perception of an emergent consonant in the McGurk effect.
Burnham D; Dodd B
Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Dec; 45(4):204-20. PubMed ID: 15549685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.
Yeung HH; Werker JF
Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19765698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Infants' learning of novel words in a stochastic environment.
Vouloumanos A; Werker JF
Dev Psychol; 2009 Nov; 45(6):1611-7. PubMed ID: 19899918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infants' visual preferences in the presence and absence of auditory stimulation.
Moore DS
J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Feb; 59(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 7876769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of auditory input in individuation tasks.
Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):869-81. PubMed ID: 19046156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Development of the responses to the sensory stimuli in infants and children].
Kaga M
No To Shinkei; 1989 Sep; 41(9):863-76. PubMed ID: 2686729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a picture worth a thousand words? The flexible nature of modality dominance in young children.
Napolitano AC; Sloutsky VM
Child Dev; 2004; 75(6):1850-70. PubMed ID: 15566384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infants prefer motionese to adult-directed action.
Brand RJ; Shallcross WL
Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):853-61. PubMed ID: 19046154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Developmental course of auditory processing interactions: Garner interference and Simon interference.
Jerger S; Pearson DA; Spence MJ
J Exp Child Psychol; 1999 Sep; 74(1):44-67. PubMed ID: 10433790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanisms that underlie coordination in children with developmental coordination disorder.
O'Brien JC; Williams HG; Bundy A; Lyons J; Mittal A
J Mot Behav; 2008 Jan; 40(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 18316296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the integration of heard and seen speech mandatory for infants?
Desjardins RN; Werker JF
Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Dec; 45(4):187-203. PubMed ID: 15549681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The visual-preference technique in infancy: effect of number of stimuli presented upon experimental outcome.
Greenberg DJ; Blue SZ
Child Dev; 1977 Mar; 48(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 844351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
