These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15370512)

  • 21. Competition between multiple causes of a single outcome in causal reasoning.
    Darredeau C; Baetu I; Baker AG; Murphy RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jan; 35(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 19159158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When is a cause the "same"? Coherent generalization across contexts.
    Liljeholm M; Cheng PW
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1014-21. PubMed ID: 17958717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies.
    Msetfi RM; Murphy RA; Simpson J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):461-81. PubMed ID: 17366312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization.
    Oppenheimer DM; Frank MC
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1178-94. PubMed ID: 17618616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of assessment type on verbal ratings of conditional stimulus valence and contingency judgments: implications for the extinction of evaluative learning.
    Lipp OV; Purkis HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 17044745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adult age differences in on-line contingency judgements.
    Parr WV; Mercier P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1998 Sep; 52(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 9849098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Causal judgment from contingency information: a systematic test of the pCI rule.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 15285120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of causal models in analogical inference.
    Lee HS; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1111-22. PubMed ID: 18763895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of wording and stimulus format on the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Mar; 31(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 12749465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic effects of alcohol cues on sexual attraction.
    Friedman RS; McCarthy DM; Förster J; Denzler M
    Addiction; 2005 May; 100(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 15847625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The causal asymmetry.
    White PA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):132-47. PubMed ID: 16478304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment.
    Letzring TD; Wells SM; Funder DC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 16834483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contingency learning without awareness: evidence for implicit control.
    Schmidt JR; Crump MJ; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):421-35. PubMed ID: 16899377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jul; 29(4):710-27. PubMed ID: 12924869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Structure and strength in causal induction.
    Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Dec; 51(4):334-84. PubMed ID: 16168981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rheumatologists' judgements about the efficacy of anti-TNF therapy in two neighbouring regions.
    Kee F; Sheehy N; O'Hare L; Bane C; Bell A; Dempster M; FitzGerald O
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2005 Nov; 44(11):1407-13. PubMed ID: 16030081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When Equal Chances = Good Chances: Verbal Probabilities and the Equiprobability Effect.
    Teigen KH
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 May; 85(1):77-108. PubMed ID: 11341818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.