These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15370857)

  • 1. The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing.
    Milosavljevic S; Carman AB; Milburn PD; Wilson BD; Davidson PL
    Ergonomics; 2004 Sep; 47(11):1208-25. PubMed ID: 15370857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional spinal motion and risk of low back injury during sheep shearing.
    Milosavljevic S; Carman AB; Schneiders AG; Milburn PD; Wilson BD
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 16842737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trunk postures and peak and cumulative low back kinetics during upright posture sheep shearing.
    Gregory DE; Laughton C; Carman A; Milosavljevic S; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1576-83. PubMed ID: 19941189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying low back peak and cumulative loads in open and senior sheep shearers in New Zealand: examining the effects of a trunk harness.
    Gregory DE; Milosavljevic S; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2006 Aug; 49(10):968-81. PubMed ID: 16803727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of occupation on lumbar sagittal motion and posture.
    Milosavljevic S; Milburn PD; Knox BW
    Ergonomics; 2005 May; 48(6):657-67. PubMed ID: 16087500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic comparison of stooped sheep shearing techniques and shearing with a sheep manipulator.
    Marshall RN; Burnett AF
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Mar; 35(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15105075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of skill and low back pain on trunk postures and low back loads of shearers.
    Pal P; Milosavljevic S; Gregory DE; Carman AB; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2010 Jan; 53(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 20069482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An examination of shoulder kinematics and kinetics when using a commercial trunk harness while sheep shearing.
    Gregory DE; Milosavljevic S; Pal P; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17572373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of varying the rest period on the onset angle of lumbar flexion-relaxation in simulated sheep shearing: a preliminary study.
    Robinson M; Mayer R; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Manzie C
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():83-88. PubMed ID: 31374611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating ergonomic stresses in North Carolina commercial crab pot and gill net fishermen.
    Kucera KL; Mirka GA; Loomis D; Marshall SW; Lipscomb HJ; Daniels J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):182-96. PubMed ID: 18213532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of nursing tasks in a hospital setting.
    Jang R; Karwowski W; Quesada PM; Rodrick D; Sherehiy B; Cronin SN; Layer JK
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1835-55. PubMed ID: 17972205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lumbosacral orthoses reduce trunk muscle activity in a postural control task.
    Cholewicki J; Reeves NP; Everding VQ; Morrisette DC
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1731-6. PubMed ID: 17054963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting.
    Callaghan JP; McGill SM
    Ergonomics; 2001 Feb; 44(3):280-94. PubMed ID: 11219760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between spinal loads and the psychophysical determination of maximum acceptable force during pushing tasks.
    Le P; Dufour J; Monat H; Rose J; Huber Z; Alder E; Radin Umar RZ; Hennessey B; Dutt M; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1104-14. PubMed ID: 22676341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of lumbosacral orthoses on spine stability: what changes in EMG can be expected?
    Cholewicki J
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Sep; 22(5):1150-5. PubMed ID: 15304292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.