BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15371250)

  • 1. Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data.
    Ho SY; Jermiin L
    Syst Biol; 2004 Aug; 53(4):623-37. PubMed ID: 15371250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Untangling long branches: identifying conflicting phylogenetic signals using spectral analysis, neighbor-net, and consensus networks.
    Kennedy M; Holland BR; Gray RD; Spencer HG
    Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):620-33. PubMed ID: 16109705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconstruction of ancestral nucleotide sequences and estimation of substitution frequencies in a star phylogeny.
    Arndt PF
    Gene; 2007 Apr; 390(1-2):75-83. PubMed ID: 17223282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera.
    Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen Coates V
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 16012091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SIMPROT: using an empirically determined indel distribution in simulations of protein evolution.
    Pang A; Smith AD; Nuin PA; Tillier ER
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 6():236. PubMed ID: 16188037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A site- and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement.
    Blanquart S; Lartillot N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):842-58. PubMed ID: 18234708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics.
    Brinkmann H; van der Giezen M; Zhou Y; Poncelin de Raucourt G; Philippe H
    Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):743-57. PubMed ID: 16243762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications.
    Goremykin VV; Holland B; Hirsch-Ernst KI; Hellwig FH
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Sep; 22(9):1813-22. PubMed ID: 15930156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ancestral sequence alignment under optimal conditions.
    Hudek AK; Brown DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():273. PubMed ID: 16293191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phylogenetic mixture models can reduce node-density artifacts.
    Venditti C; Meade A; Pagel M
    Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18432549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny.
    Redelings BD; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):401-18. PubMed ID: 16012107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of heterotachy in multigene analysis using the neighbor joining method.
    Som A; Fuellen G
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):846-51. PubMed ID: 19482090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the correlation between composition and site-specific evolutionary rate: implications for phylogenetic inference.
    Gowri-Shankar V; Rattray M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):352-64. PubMed ID: 16237207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treeness triangles: visualizing the loss of phylogenetic signal.
    White WT; Hills SF; Gaddam R; Holland BR; Penny D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2029-39. PubMed ID: 17630280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction.
    Steel M; Huson D; Lockhart PJ
    Syst Biol; 2000 Jun; 49(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 12118406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Support patterns from different outgroups provide a strong phylogenetic signal.
    Schneider A; Cannarozzi GM
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Jun; 26(6):1259-72. PubMed ID: 19240194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences.
    Hall BG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):792-802. PubMed ID: 15590907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing the efficiency of searches for the maximum likelihood tree in a phylogenetic analysis of up to 150 nucleotide sequences.
    Morrison DA
    Syst Biol; 2007 Dec; 56(6):988-1010. PubMed ID: 18066931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of protein distance measures and tree-building methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Hollich V; Milchert L; Arvestad L; Sonnhammer EL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2257-64. PubMed ID: 16049194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.