194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15371315)
1. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A perceptibility curve comparison of Ultra-speed and Ektaspeed Plus films.
Tjelmeland EM; Moore WS; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 9574962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the image quality of a CCD-based digital intraoral radiography system: application of perceptibility curve test.
Hayakawa Y; Kitagawa H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K; Welander U
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2000 Feb; 41(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11212381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
Horner K; Rushton VE; Shearer AC
J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
Geist JR; Brand JW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Nasstrom K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24404600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitometric and clinical evaluation of a new F-speed dental X-ray film.
Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11175272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparison of Kodak Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus, and Agfa M2 Comfort dental x-ray films for the detection of caries.
Hintze H; Christoffersen L; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 8665322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
Ludlow JB; Platin E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Näsström K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24170798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
