These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15371645)

  • 1. Confocal 3D DNA cytometry: assessment of required coefficient of variation by computer simulation.
    Ploeger LS; Beliën JA; Poulin NM; Grizzle W; van Diest PJ
    Cell Oncol; 2004; 26(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 15371645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of accurate and fast DNA cytometry by confocal microscopy in 3D.
    Ploeger LS; Huisman A; van der Gugten J; van der Giezen DM; Beliën JA; Abbaker AY; Dullens HF; Grizzle W; Poulin NM; Meijer GA; van Diest PJ
    Cell Oncol; 2005; 27(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 16308471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional confocal laser scanning DNA ploidy cytometry in thick histological sections.
    Tekola P; Baak JP; van Ginkel HA; Belien JA; van Diest PJ; Broeckaert MA; Schuurmans LT
    J Pathol; 1996 Oct; 180(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 8976883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confocal DNA cytometry: a contour-based segmentation algorithm for automated three-dimensional image segmentation.
    Beliën JA; van Ginkel HA; Tekola P; Ploeger LS; Poulin NM; Baak JP; van Diest PJ
    Cytometry; 2002 Sep; 49(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 12210606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confocal 3D DNA cytometry: assessment of required coefficient of variation by computer simulation.
    Garini Y
    Cell Oncol; 2006; 28(3):121-2; author reply 123. PubMed ID: 16823182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of sensitivity in DNA aneuploidy detection using a mathematical model.
    Benson NA; Braylan RC
    Cytometry; 1994 Jan; 15(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8162825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer cases.
    Bergers E; Montironi R; van Diest PJ; Prete E; Baak JP
    Hum Pathol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8666364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA flow cytometry of cells obtained from old paraffin-embedded specimens. A comparison with results of scanning absorption cytometry (a methodological study).
    Fosså SD; Thorud E; Shoaib MC; Pettersen EO
    Pathol Res Pract; 1986 May; 181(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 3526304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of human solid tumors: a review of the interpretation of DNA histograms.
    Wersto RP; Liblit RL; Koss LG
    Hum Pathol; 1991 Nov; 22(11):1085-98. PubMed ID: 1743692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance.
    Zucker RM; Price O
    Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):273-94. PubMed ID: 11500845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical evaluation of confocal microscopy images.
    Zucker RM; Price OT
    Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 11500846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative cytogenetic and DNA flow cytometric analysis of 150 bone and soft-tissue tumors.
    Mandahl N; Baldetorp B; Fernö M; Akerman M; Rydholm A; Heim S; Willén H; Killander D; Mitelman F
    Int J Cancer; 1993 Feb; 53(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 8428789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confocal 3-dimensional DNA image cytometry in thick tissue sections.
    Czader M; Liljeborg A; Auer G; Porwit A
    Cytometry; 1996 Nov; 25(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 8914821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of DNA histograms by computer (author's transl)].
    Pfitzer P; Vyska K; Stecher G
    Beitr Pathol; 1976 Nov; 159(2):157-85. PubMed ID: 137714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of resolution reduction on data analysis.
    Hunsberger B; Bagwell CB; Herbert D; Bray C; Langweiler M
    Cytometry A; 2003 Jun; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 12766972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional DNA image cytometry by confocal scanning laser microscopy in thick tissue blocks of prostatic lesions.
    Irinopoulou T; Vassy J; Beil M; Nicolopoulou P; Encaoua D; Rigaut JP
    Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 27(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 9012376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different mathematical algorithms to correct DNA-histograms obtained by measurements on thin liver tissue sections.
    Mairinger T; Gschwendtner A
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 Aug; 11(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 8888952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumour heterogeneity of DNA cell cycle variables in breast cancer measured by flow cytometry.
    Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Nov; 49(11):931-7. PubMed ID: 8944615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of DNA ploidy in 115 fresh-frozen breast carcinomas by image analysis versus flow cytometry.
    Ghali VS; Liau S; Teplitz C; Prudente R
    Cancer; 1992 Dec; 70(11):2668-72. PubMed ID: 1423197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjective assessment of frequency distribution histograms and consequences on reference interval accuracy for small sample sizes: A computer-simulated study.
    Coisnon C; Mitchell MA; Rannou B; Le Boedec K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Sep; 50(3):427-441. PubMed ID: 34476826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.