These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1537174)

  • 1. The prosthesis-bone interface in total knee arthroplasty.
    Matthews LS; Goldstein SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Mar; (276):50-5. PubMed ID: 1537174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of tibial component fixation techniques on resorption of supporting bone stock after total knee replacement.
    Chong DY; Hansen UN; van der Venne R; Verdonschot N; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 2011 Mar; 44(5):948-54. PubMed ID: 21236431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone cement--porous coated or hydroxylapatite coated prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty--state of the art--future trends.
    Worland RL
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1997; 63 Suppl 1():109-13. PubMed ID: 9532863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A histomorphometric and histologic analysis of the implant interface in five successful, autopsy-retrieved, noncemented porous-coated knee arthroplasties.
    Vigorita VJ; Minkowitz B; Dichiara JF; Higham PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Aug; (293):211-8. PubMed ID: 8339483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osseointegration in porous coated knee arthroplasty. The influence of component coating type in sheep.
    Bellemans J
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Oct; 288():1-35. PubMed ID: 10949554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical bond strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty.
    Pittman GT; Peters CL; Hines JL; Bachus KN
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 16950044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mineral apposition rates of human cancellous bone at the interface of porous coated implants.
    Bloebaum RD; Bachus KN; Momberger NG; Hofmann AA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 May; 28(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 8027094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cementless fixation of prosthetic components in total arthroplasty of the knee and hip.
    Freeman MA; McLeod HC; Levai JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):88-94. PubMed ID: 6851346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biologic fixation and bone ingrowth.
    Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jan; 36(1):105-11, vii. PubMed ID: 15542129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The bone-cement interface: histological observations on the interface of cemented arthroplasties within the immediate and late phases.
    Boss JH; Shajrawi I; Dekel S; Mendes DG
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 1993; 5(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 8155610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental studies of bone remodeling in total hip arthroplasty.
    Sumner DR; Turner TM; Urban RM; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Mar; (276):83-90. PubMed ID: 1537179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of posterior cruciate sacrifice on durability of the cement-bone interface. A nine-year survivorship study of 100 total condylar knee arthroplasties.
    Ranawat CS; Hansraj KK
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1989 Jan; 20(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2919080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tibial component fixation with cement: full- versus surface-cementation techniques.
    Peters CL; Craig MA; Mohr RA; Bachus KN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Apr; (409):158-68. PubMed ID: 12671498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A metal-backed, rotating-bearing patellar prosthesis to lower contact stress. An 11-year clinical study.
    Buechel FF; Rosa RA; Pappas MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):34-49. PubMed ID: 2805494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consequences of an interference fit on the fixation of porous-coated tibial components in total knee replacement.
    Dawson JM; Bartel DL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Feb; 74(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 1541617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which designs last?
    Forster MC
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 12728416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of pegs and screws on bone ingrowth in cementless total knee arthroplasty.
    Sumner DR; Turner TM; Dawson D; Rosenberg AG; Urban RM; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Dec; (309):150-5. PubMed ID: 7994954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.