232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15371834)
1. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Ward JF; Zincke H; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Blute ML
J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1328-32. PubMed ID: 15371834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Erectile Function Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High Risk Features.
Recabal P; Assel M; Musser JE; Caras RJ; Sjoberg DD; Coleman JA; Mulhall JP; Parra RO; Scardino PT; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Laudone VP
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 26905018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 prostate cancer.
Bigg SW; Kavoussi LR; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 1990 Dec; 144(6):1420-4. PubMed ID: 1700156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of surgeon-defined capsular incision during radical prostatectomy on biochemical recurrence rates.
Mandel P; Oh SJ; Hagner C; Tennstedt P; Kriegmair MC; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
World J Urol; 2016 Nov; 34(11):1547-1553. PubMed ID: 27003277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Functional and oncological outcome of salvage prostatectomy of locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy].
Heidenreich A; Ohlmann C; Ozgür E; Engelmann U
Urologe A; 2006 Apr; 45(4):474-81. PubMed ID: 16465521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure.
Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; Graefen M; Erbersdobler A; Haese A; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 15661411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.
Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Huxhold C; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Hansen J; Budäus L; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Minner S; Haese A; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 22591631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative erectile function is an independent predictor for decision to spare cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy.
Stember DS; Nelson CJ; Mulhall JP
J Sex Med; 2013 Aug; 10(8):2101-7. PubMed ID: 23679104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute.
Guillonneau B; el-Fettouh H; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Doublet JD; Fromont G; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1261-6. PubMed ID: 12629339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Schlesselman JJ; Soloway MS
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 20(7):1853-8. PubMed ID: 11919244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of time from biopsy to surgery on complications, functional and oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy.
Westerman ME; Sharma V; Bailey GC; Boorjian SA; Frank I; Gettman MT; Thompson RH; Tollefson MK; Karnes RJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(3):468-477. PubMed ID: 30676305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group.
Teeter AE; Bañez LL; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1980-4; discussion 1985. PubMed ID: 18801519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
