These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1537232)

  • 1. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.
    MacDonald MC; Just MA; Carpenter PA
    Cogn Psychol; 1992 Jan; 24(1):56-98. PubMed ID: 1537232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.
    Long DL; Prat CS
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):375-91. PubMed ID: 18426067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
    Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
    Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.
    Spivey-Knowlton M; Sedivy JC
    Cognition; 1995 Jun; 55(3):227-67. PubMed ID: 7634760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses.
    Spivey-Knowlton MJ; Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):276-309. PubMed ID: 8364532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.
    Spivey MJ; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1521-43. PubMed ID: 9835064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.
    Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK; Kello C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):528-53. PubMed ID: 8501429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries.
    Haberlandt K; Graesser AC
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 2927316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.
    Vandendaele A; Declerck M; Grainger J; Snell J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103006. PubMed ID: 31955032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.
    Gunter TC; Wagner S; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 12965038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.
    Just MA; Carpenter PA
    Psychol Rev; 1992 Jan; 99(1):122-49. PubMed ID: 1546114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: evidence from self-paced listening.
    Waters GS; Caplan D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jan; 57(1):129-63. PubMed ID: 14681007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye-fixation patterns of high- and low-span young and older adults: down the garden path and back again.
    Kemper S; Crow A; Kemtes K
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):157-70. PubMed ID: 15065939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context effects in visual word recognition: lexical relatedness and syntactic context.
    Schriefers H; Friederici AD; Rose U
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1292-303. PubMed ID: 9847552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.
    Waters GS; Caplan D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):51-75. PubMed ID: 8920099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The capacity theory of comprehension: new frontiers of evidence and arguments.
    Just MA; Carpenter PA; Keller TA
    Psychol Rev; 1996 Oct; 103(4):773-80. PubMed ID: 8888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.
    Fiebach CJ; Vos SH; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1562-75. PubMed ID: 15601519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of sentence form on the construction of mental plans from procedural discourse.
    Dixon P; Harrison K; Taylor D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 8364535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.
    Birch S; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 9337583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.