These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1537232)

  • 21. Hemispheric processing of inferences: the effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity.
    Virtue S; van den Broek P; Linderholm T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1341-54. PubMed ID: 17225513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in dyslexia: An examination of cognitive factors underlying eye movement differences and comprehension failures.
    Stella M; Engelhardt PE
    Dyslexia; 2019 May; 25(2):115-141. PubMed ID: 30990960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. That's the way the cookie bounces: syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends.
    Cutting JC; Bock K
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 9046870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.
    Mecklinger A; Schriefers H; Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):477-94. PubMed ID: 7666761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.
    Schmauder AR; Egan MC
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1304-12. PubMed ID: 9847553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention factors mediating syntactic deficiency in reading-disabled children.
    Deutsch A; Bentin S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):386-415. PubMed ID: 8923752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992).
    Waters GS; Caplan D
    Psychol Rev; 1996 Oct; 103(4):761-72. PubMed ID: 8888653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition.
    Bernolet S; Hartsuiker RJ; Pickering MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):931-49. PubMed ID: 17723070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.
    Andrews G; Birney D; Halford GS
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1325-40. PubMed ID: 17225512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of phonemic repetition on syntactic ambiguity resolution: implications for models of working memory.
    Kennison SM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2004 Nov; 33(6):493-516. PubMed ID: 15614991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Younger and older adults' on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Kemtes KA; Kemper S
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Jun; 12(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 9189996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Subsequent to suppression: Downstream comprehension consequences of noun/verb ambiguity in natural reading.
    Stites MC; Federmeier KD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1497-515. PubMed ID: 25961358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Competition and working memory in sentence reading: Evidence from Spanish.
    Togato G; Macizo P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Dec; 74(4):316-329. PubMed ID: 31971436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2021 Aug; 24(4):612-627. PubMed ID: 35669170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Proactive interference effects on sentence production.
    Ferreira VS; Firato CE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 12613685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.
    Mohamed MT; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1797-820. PubMed ID: 21722057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural synchronization mediates on-line sentence processing: EEG coherence evidence from filler-gap constructions.
    Haarmann HI; Cameron KA; Ruchkin DS
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):820-5. PubMed ID: 12462509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Working memory and online syntactic processing in Alzheimer's disease: studies with auditory moving window presentation.
    Waters G; Caplan D
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2002 Jul; 57(4):P298-311. PubMed ID: 12084781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.
    Gordon PC; Hendrick R; Levine WH
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Sep; 13(5):425-30. PubMed ID: 12219808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.